• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT 的免费语言编辑服务会让科学传播领域的竞争更加公平吗?:与非英语母语学者合作项目的见解。

Will ChatGPT's Free Language Editing Service Level the Playing Field in Science Communication?: Insights from a Collaborative Project with Non-native English Scholars.

机构信息

Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Dec 19;12(1):565-574. doi: 10.5334/pme.1246. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.5334/pme.1246
PMID:38163049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10756157/
Abstract

ChatGPT has been widely heralded as a way to level the playing field in scientific communication through its free language editing service. However, such claims lack systematic evidence. A writing scholar (LL) and six non-native English scholars researching health professions education collaborated on this Writer's Craft to fill this gap. Our overarching aim was to provide experiential evidence about ChatGPT's performance as a language editor and writing coach. We implemented three cycles of a systematic procedure, describing how we developed our prompts, selected text for editing, incrementally prompted to refine ChatGPT's responses, and analyzed the quality of its language edits and explanations. From this experience, we offer five insights, and we conclude that the optimism about ChatGPT's capacity to level the playing field for non-native English writers should be tempered. In the writer's craft section we offer simple tips to improve your writing in one of three areas: Energy, Clarity and Persuasiveness. Each entry focuses on a key writing feature or strategy, illustrates how it commonly goes wrong, teaches the grammatical underpinnings necessary to understand it and offers suggestions to wield it effectively. We encourage readers to share comments on or suggestions for this section on Twitter, using the hashtag: #how'syourwriting?

摘要

ChatGPT 凭借其免费的语言编辑服务,被誉为在科学传播中实现公平竞争的一种方式。然而,此类说法缺乏系统的证据。一位写作学者(LL)和六位研究健康职业教育的非英语母语学者合作撰写了这篇《作家的技巧》,以填补这一空白。我们的总体目标是提供关于 ChatGPT 作为语言编辑和写作教练的表现的经验证据。我们实施了三个循环的系统程序,描述了我们如何开发提示、选择要编辑的文本、逐步提示以改进 ChatGPT 的响应以及分析其语言编辑和解释的质量。通过这次经历,我们提出了五个见解,并得出结论,应该缓和对 ChatGPT 为非英语母语作家实现公平竞争能力的乐观情绪。在作家的技巧部分,我们提供了三个方面提高写作水平的简单技巧:活力、清晰度和说服力。每个条目都侧重于一个关键的写作特征或策略,说明它通常是如何出错的,教授理解它所需的语法基础,并提供有效运用它的建议。我们鼓励读者在 Twitter 上分享对这一部分的评论或建议,使用的标签是:#how'syourwriting?

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/d7b231e7fcd7/pme-12-1-1246-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/bb8bb112aaa3/pme-12-1-1246-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/f7fcec9c5375/pme-12-1-1246-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/59ec02a2762f/pme-12-1-1246-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/1a7b94da2a59/pme-12-1-1246-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/d7b231e7fcd7/pme-12-1-1246-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/bb8bb112aaa3/pme-12-1-1246-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/f7fcec9c5375/pme-12-1-1246-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/59ec02a2762f/pme-12-1-1246-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/1a7b94da2a59/pme-12-1-1246-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c99/10756157/d7b231e7fcd7/pme-12-1-1246-g5.jpg

相似文献

1
Will ChatGPT's Free Language Editing Service Level the Playing Field in Science Communication?: Insights from a Collaborative Project with Non-native English Scholars.ChatGPT 的免费语言编辑服务会让科学传播领域的竞争更加公平吗?:与非英语母语学者合作项目的见解。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Dec 19;12(1):565-574. doi: 10.5334/pme.1246. eCollection 2023.
2
The Art of Revising.修订的艺术。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jun 20;12(1):247-252. doi: 10.5334/pme.1073. eCollection 2023.
3
Creating in Your Writing- to 'Use' (or Not).在写作中创造——使用(或不使用)
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Oct 4;13(1):481-485. doi: 10.5334/pme.1540. eCollection 2024.
4
ChatGPT's performance in German OB/GYN exams - paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice.ChatGPT在德国妇产科考试中的表现——为人工智能强化医学教育和临床实践铺平道路。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 13;10:1296615. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1296615. eCollection 2023.
5
AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing.人工智能语言模型在人类生殖研究中的应用:探索 ChatGPT 在辅助学术写作方面的潜力。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Dec 4;38(12):2281-2288. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead207.
6
Assessing ChatGPT's capacity for clinical decision support in pediatrics: A comparative study with pediatricians using KIDMAP of Rasch analysis.评估 ChatGPT 在儿科临床决策支持方面的能力:使用 KIDMAP 的 Rasch 分析与儿科医生进行的比较研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 23;102(25):e34068. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034068.
7
Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study.ChatGPT 的知识和解释能力与韩国医学生在寄生虫学考试中的表现相当吗?一项描述性研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:1. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.1. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
8
How does ChatGPT-4 preform on non-English national medical licensing examination? An evaluation in Chinese language.ChatGPT-4在非英语国家医学执照考试中的表现如何?中文语言环境下的一项评估。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Dec 1;2(12):e0000397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000397. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Revolutionizing Medical Education: Can ChatGPT Boost Subjective Learning and Expression?**颠覆医学教育**:ChatGPT 能否提升主观学习和表达能力?
J Med Syst. 2023 May 9;47(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01957-w.
10
Comprehensive evaluation of molecule property prediction with ChatGPT.ChatGPT 进行分子性质预测的综合评估。
Methods. 2024 Feb;222:133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.01.004. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions.大语言模型对医学写作与出版的变革性影响:当前应用、挑战及未来方向
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 1;28(5):393-401. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.5.393.
2
Being the supervisor: A duo-ethnographic exploration of social justice in postgraduate health professions education.作为导师:对研究生健康专业教育中社会正义的双人种志探索。
Med Educ. 2025 Jan;59(1):104-113. doi: 10.1111/medu.15485. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case for Federated Learning Methods.提高电子健康记录人工智能模型的公平性:联邦学习方法的案例
FAccT 23 (2023). 2023 Jun;2023:1599-1608. doi: 10.1145/3593013.3594102. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
Is ChatGPT a "Fire of Prometheus" for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing?ChatGPT 是否为非英语母语的学术写作者带来了“普罗米修斯之火”?
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Oct;24(10):952-959. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0773.
3
The Integration of Large Language Models Such as ChatGPT in Scientific Writing: Harnessing Potential and Addressing Pitfalls.
ChatGPT等大语言模型在科学写作中的整合:发挥潜力与应对陷阱
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Sep;24(9):924-925. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0738.
4
The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science.非英语母语者在科学领域的多重代价。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Jul 18;21(7):e3002184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT: A Guide for Academic Writers.《ChatGPT 提示工程:学术写作者指南》
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Dec;51(12):2629-2633. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03272-4. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
6
The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.ChatGPT在科学交流中的作用:撰写更优质的科学综述文章。
Am J Cancer Res. 2023 Apr 15;13(4):1148-1154. eCollection 2023.
7
Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles.在科学文章中使用ChatGPT进行语言编辑。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Mar 8;45(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40902-023-00381-x.
8
Scientific novelty beyond the experiment.实验之外的科学新颖性。
Microb Biotechnol. 2023 Jun;16(6):1131-1173. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14222. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
9
ChatGPT: five priorities for research.ChatGPT:研究的五个优先事项。
Nature. 2023 Feb;614(7947):224-226. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7.
10
The leaky pipeline of publications and knowledge generation in medical education.医学教育中出版物和知识生成的漏洞百出的渠道。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Mar;11(2):70-72. doi: 10.1007/s40037-022-00700-4. Epub 2022 Mar 3.