Suppr超能文献

内侧颞叶网络的内源性功能连接与易受错误信息影响有关。

Intrinsic functional connectivity in medial temporal lobe networks is associated with susceptibility to misinformation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2024 Nov;32(10):1358-1370. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2298921. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

Abstract

Memory is notoriously fallible and susceptible to misinformation. Yet little is known about the underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms that render individuals vulnerable to this type of false memory. The current experiments take an individual differences approach to examine whether susceptibility to misinformation reflects stable underlying factors related to memory retrieval. In Study 1, we report for the first time the existence of substantial individual variability in susceptibility to misinformation in the context of repeated memory retrieval, when the misinformation effect is most pronounced. This variability was not related to an individual's tendency to adopt an episodic retrieval style during remembering (trait mnemonics). In Study 2, we next examined whether susceptibility to misinformation is related to intrinsic functional connectivity in medial temporal lobe (MTL) networks known to coordinate memory reactivation during event retrieval. Stronger resting-state functional connectivity between the MTL and cortical areas associated with visual memory reactivation (occipital cortex) was associated with better protection from misinformation. Together, these results reveal that while memory distortion is a universal property of our reconstructive memory system, susceptibility to misinformation varies at the individual level and may depend on one's ability to reactivate visual details during memory retrieval.

摘要

记忆是出了名的不可靠,容易受到错误信息的影响。然而,人们对导致个体易受这种虚假记忆影响的潜在认知和神经机制知之甚少。当前的实验采用个体差异的方法来研究易受错误信息影响是否反映了与记忆检索相关的稳定的潜在因素。在研究 1 中,我们首次报告了在重复记忆检索的情况下,易受错误信息影响存在大量个体差异,此时错误信息效应最为明显。这种可变性与个体在记忆时采用情节检索风格的倾向(特质助记符)无关。在研究 2 中,我们接下来研究了易受错误信息影响是否与内侧颞叶(MTL)网络的内在功能连接有关,这些网络已知在事件检索期间协调记忆再激活。MTL 与与视觉记忆再激活相关的皮质区域(枕叶皮层)之间的静息状态功能连接越强,受到错误信息的保护就越好。总之,这些结果表明,尽管记忆扭曲是我们的重构记忆系统的普遍特性,但易受错误信息影响的程度在个体水平上存在差异,并且可能取决于个体在记忆检索过程中重新激活视觉细节的能力。

相似文献

1
Intrinsic functional connectivity in medial temporal lobe networks is associated with susceptibility to misinformation.
Memory. 2024 Nov;32(10):1358-1370. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2298921. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
2
Intrinsic medial temporal lobe connectivity relates to individual differences in episodic autobiographical remembering.
Cortex. 2016 Jan;74:206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
3
Age-Related Compensatory Reconfiguration of PFC Connections during Episodic Memory Retrieval.
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jan 5;31(2):717-730. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa192.
4
Laterality effects in functional connectivity of the angular gyrus during rest and episodic retrieval.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 8;80:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Dynamic changes in large-scale functional network organization during autobiographical memory retrieval.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Feb;110:208-224. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
7
Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 15;117(37):22771-22779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008595117. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Prior knowledge modulates the neural substrates of encoding and retrieving naturalistic events at short and long delays.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Sep;153(Pt A):26-39. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Retrieval of high-fidelity memory arises from distributed cortical networks.
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 1;149:178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.062. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Not the same as it ever was: A review of memory modification, updating, and distortion in humans and rodents.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 Jul;174:106195. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106195. Epub 2025 May 3.

本文引用的文献

2
Dynamic changes in neural representations underlie the repetition effect on false memory.
Neuroimage. 2022 Oct 1;259:119442. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119442. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
3
Troubled past: A critical psychometric assessment of the self-report Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM).
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):261-286. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01604-7. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Transforming the Concept of Memory Reactivation.
Trends Neurosci. 2020 Dec;43(12):939-950. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
5
Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 15;117(37):22771-22779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008595117. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
7
Who is susceptible in three false memory tasks?
Memory. 2019 Aug;27(7):962-984. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1611862. Epub 2019 May 2.
8
Multiple interactive memory representations underlie the induction of false memory.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 26;116(9):3466-3475. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817925116. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories: The effect of memory specificity.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jul;71(7):1637-1644. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1345961. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
10
The Impact of Testing on the Formation of Children's and Adults' False Memories.
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2016 Sep-Oct;30(5):785-794. doi: 10.1002/acp.3254. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验