Suppr超能文献

一项关于低强度认知行为疗法治疗广泛性焦虑症疗效的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis on the efficacy of low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy for generalised anxiety disorder.

机构信息

Clinical Psychological Services, New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Hunan, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05306-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LICBT) has been recommended as a primary intervention in the tiered care for mild to moderate generalised anxiety disorder. However, LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder are markedly diverse and efficacy data on various outcomes have not been systematically reviewed. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesise effect sizes of three NICE-recommended LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder: non-facilitated self-help, guided self-help, and psychoeducational groups.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder in the last 23 years (2000-2023) was conducted. Efficacy data for anxiety, depression, and worry outcomes were separately meta-analysed. The study was reported following the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 12 RCTs out of 1205 papers. The three meta-analyses consisted of 12 (anxiety), 11 (depression), and 9 (worry) effect sizes respectively, including total sample sizes of 1201 (anxiety), 1164 (depression), and 908 (worry). The adjusted effect sizes for reductions in anxiety (g = -0.63), depression (g = -0.48), and worry (g = -0.64) were all in the medium range, favouring LICBT over control conditions. Between-study heterogeneity was significant on anxiety and worry, with no specific moderators identified by meta-regression.

CONCLUSIONS

LICBT has shown promise as an effective and efficient treatment modality for individuals with generalised anxiety disorder. Future research comparing various LICBT subtypes and treatment components will further inform clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; record ID CRD42021285590).

摘要

背景

低强度认知行为疗法(LICBT)已被推荐作为轻度至中度广泛性焦虑症分层护理的主要干预措施。然而,针对广泛性焦虑症的 LICBT 差异很大,各种结果的疗效数据尚未系统综述。本项荟萃分析旨在综合三种 NICE 推荐的 LICBT 治疗广泛性焦虑症的效应量:非促进自助、指导自助和心理教育小组。

方法

对过去 23 年(2000-2023 年)发表的 LICBT 治疗广泛性焦虑症的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统文献回顾。分别对焦虑、抑郁和担忧结局的疗效数据进行荟萃分析。研究按照 PRISMA 指南进行报告。

结果

系统综述共确定了 1205 篇论文中的 12 项 RCT。三项荟萃分析分别包含 12 项(焦虑)、11 项(抑郁)和 9 项(担忧)的效应量,总样本量分别为 1201(焦虑)、1164(抑郁)和 908(担忧)。焦虑(g=-0.63)、抑郁(g=-0.48)和担忧(g=-0.64)减少的调整效应量均处于中等范围,表明 LICBT 优于对照条件。焦虑和担忧的研究间异质性显著,元回归未确定特定的调节因素。

结论

LICBT 已显示出作为治疗广泛性焦虑症的有效和高效治疗模式的潜力。未来比较各种 LICBT 亚型和治疗成分的研究将进一步为临床实践提供信息。

试验注册

本系统综述方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO;登记号 CRD42021285590)中进行了注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf63/10763350/0b299db4b65b/12888_2023_5306_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验