Suppr超能文献

印度西孟加拉邦基层医疗机构快速尿路感染诊断试剂盒的诊断验证研究。

Diagnostic validation study of rapid urinary tract infection diagnosis kit at peripheral health facilities of West Bengal, India.

机构信息

ICMR-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, P-33, CIT Road, Scheme-XM, Beliaghata, Kolkata, 10, India.

Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal, South 24 Pargana, India.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):297. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49489-0.

Abstract

Patients reporting to the outpatient departments of peripheral health care settings in India with symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) receive one or the other antibiotic before culture confirmation and out of the total culture confirmed UTI cases, in less than one third cases the prescribed antibiotics matches to the antibiotic sensitivity test result. Hence, in this study, an indigenous point-of-care (POCT) rapid diagnostic kit (Rapidogram) for UTI was validated against conventional urine culture and sensitivity to understand its possible applicability at peripheral health care settings. This cross-sectional study was conducted during November 2021 to June 2022 in OPDs of two peripheral hospitals. A sample size of 300 was calculated using prevalence of urinary tract infection (UTI) as 33% for sensitivity and specificity using Buderer's formula. Urine specimens were collected following standard aseptic procedures from the recruited suspected UTI cases and transferred to laboratory maintaining the cold chain. The validation work up was done in two sections: lab validation and field validation. Out of 300 urine samples, 29 were found positive for the growth of UTI pathogen by both methods and 267 were found negative by both methods. Thus, the kit shows very high specificity (99.6%; 97.9-99.9%) and considerably high sensitivity (90.6%; 74.9-98.0%). We also observed higher PPV, NPV, test accuracy (> 96%). Diagnostic Odds Ratio and Youden index were respectively 2581 and 0.89. Clinical data showed that 44% of the suspected UTI cases were prescribed at least one antibiotic before urine test. Mostly they received Norfloxacin whereas the mostly identified organism E.coli was sensitive to Nitrofurantoin. In the context of absence of microbiology facility at peripheral setting and rampant empirical use of antibiotics in UTI, this highly specific and sensitive POCT for UTI may be used as it not only identifies the organism, also shows the antibiotic sensitivity pattern.

摘要

印度的基层医疗机构门诊部门报告有尿路感染 (UTI) 症状的患者在培养确认前会接受一种或另一种抗生素,而在所有培养确认的 UTI 病例中,不到三分之一的病例所开的抗生素与抗生素敏感性测试结果相符。因此,在这项研究中,我们对一种本土的即时护理 (POCT) 快速诊断试剂盒 (Rapidogram) 进行了验证,以了解其在基层医疗机构中的可能适用性,该试剂盒针对的是尿路感染,并与传统尿液培养和药敏试验进行了对比。这项横断面研究于 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 6 月在两家基层医院的门诊部进行。使用布德勒公式计算了 300 名样本量,尿路感染 (UTI) 的患病率为 33%,用于灵敏度和特异性。按照标准无菌程序从招募的疑似 UTI 病例中采集尿液标本,并在保持冷链的情况下转移到实验室。验证工作分两个部分进行:实验室验证和现场验证。在 300 个尿液样本中,有 29 个样本通过两种方法均发现 UTI 病原体生长阳性,有 267 个样本通过两种方法均发现生长阴性。因此,该试剂盒显示出非常高的特异性 (99.6%;97.9-99.9%) 和相当高的灵敏度 (90.6%;74.9-98.0%)。我们还观察到更高的阳性预测值 (PPV)、阴性预测值 (NPV)、测试准确性 (>96%)。诊断优势比和 Youden 指数分别为 2581 和 0.89。临床数据显示,44%的疑似 UTI 病例在尿液检测前至少接受了一种抗生素治疗。他们大多接受了诺氟沙星治疗,而最常见的病原体大肠杆菌对呋喃妥因敏感。在基层医疗机构缺乏微生物学设施和尿路感染中广泛存在经验性使用抗生素的情况下,这种针对尿路感染的高特异性和高灵敏度的 POCT 可以被使用,因为它不仅可以识别病原体,还可以显示抗生素的敏感性模式。

相似文献

3
Accuracy of urinary symptoms and urine microscopy in diagnosing urinary tract infection in women.
Fam Pract. 2019 Jul 31;36(4):417-424. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy108.
4
Can a simple urinalysis predict the causative agent and the antibiotic sensitivities?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014 Apr;30(4):244-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000105.

引用本文的文献

1
XAI-driven CatBoost multi-layer perceptron neural network for analyzing breast cancer.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79620-8.
2
Innovative Biosensor Technologies in the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections: A Comprehensive Literature Review.
Indian J Microbiol. 2024 Sep;64(3):894-909. doi: 10.1007/s12088-024-01359-7. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The global burden of antimicrobial resistance - urinary tract infections.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 Mar 27;39(4):581-588. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad233.
2
Can urine dipstick test be an alternative to detect urinary tract infection in limited resource setting? - A validity study from Bangalore, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):561-566. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_696_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.
3
A new point-of-care test for the rapid detection of urinary tract infections.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;39(2):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03728-3. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
5
Prevalence and antibiotic utilization pattern of uropathogens causing community-acquired urinary tract infection in Kerala, India.
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 27;29(6):671-677. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2018-0015.
6
ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE PATTERNS OF URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS IN A NORTHEASTERN BRAZILIAN CAPITAL.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:2. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946201658002. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Urosepsis: Overview of the Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges.
Microbiol Spectr. 2015 Oct;3(5). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0003-2012.
8
Improved Confidence Intervals for the Youden Index.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 1;10(7):e0127272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127272. eCollection 2015.
9
Reliability of dipstick assay in predicting urinary tract infection.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):265-8. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.154672.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验