Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Library, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Jun 3;18(6):958-972. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad215.
Crohn's disease [CD] is frequently associated with the development of strictures and penetrating complications. Intestinal ultrasound [IUS] is a non-invasive imaging modality ideal for point-of-care assessment. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we provide a current overview on the diagnostic accuracy of IUS and its advanced modalities in the detection of intra-abdominal complications in CD compared to endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, surgery, and pathology.
We conducted a literature search for studies describing the diagnostic accuracy of IUS in adult patients with CD-related intra-abdominal complications. Quality of the included studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed for both conventional IUS [B-mode] and oral contrast IUS [SICUS].
Of the 1498 studies we identified, 68 were included in this review and 23 studies [3863 patients] were used for the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivities and specificities for strictures, inflammatory masses, and fistulas by B-mode IUS were 0.81 and 0.90, 0.87 [sensitivities] and 0.95, and 0.67 and 0.97 [specificities], respectively. Pooled overall log diagnostic odds ratios were 3.56, 3.97 and 3.84, respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of SICUS were 0.94 and 0.95, 0.91 and 0.97 [sensitivities], and 0.90 and 0.94 [specificities], respectively. The pooled overall log diagnostic odds ratios of SICUS were 4.51, 5.46, and 4.80, respectively.
IUS is accurate for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal complications in CD. As a non-invasive, point-of-care modality, IUS is recommended as the first-line imaging tool if there is a suspicion of CD-related intra-abdominal complications.
克罗恩病(CD)常伴有狭窄和穿透性并发症的发展。肠超声(IUS)是一种非侵入性的成像方式,非常适合于即时评估。在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们提供了 IUS 及其高级方式在诊断 CD 患者腹腔内并发症方面的最新概述,与内镜、影像学检查、手术和病理学相比。
我们对描述 IUS 在 CD 相关腹腔内并发症的成年患者中的诊断准确性的研究进行了文献检索。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估纳入研究的质量。对常规 IUS(B 模式)和口服对比 IUS(SICUS)进行了荟萃分析。
在我们确定的 1498 项研究中,有 68 项研究被纳入本综述,有 23 项研究[3863 例患者]用于荟萃分析。B 模式 IUS 对狭窄、炎症性肿块和瘘管的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 0.81 和 0.90、0.87[敏感性]和 0.95,以及 0.67 和 0.97[特异性]。汇总的总体对数诊断优势比分别为 3.56、3.97 和 3.84。SICUS 的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 0.94 和 0.95、0.91 和 0.97[敏感性],以及 0.90 和 0.94[特异性]。SICUS 的汇总总体对数诊断优势比分别为 4.51、5.46 和 4.80。
IUS 对 CD 患者腹腔内并发症的诊断是准确的。作为一种非侵入性的即时成像方式,如果怀疑存在 CD 相关的腹腔内并发症,IUS 被推荐作为一线成像工具。