Langenbach Marcel C, Langenbach Isabel L, Foldyna Borek, Mauri Victor, Klein Konstantin, Macherey-Meyer Sascha, Heyne Sebastian, Meertens Max, Lee Samuel, Baldus Stephan, Maintz David, Halbach Marcel, Adam Matti, Wienemann Hendrik
Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany.
Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug;34(8):4897-4908. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10549-8. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) frequently coexist. While pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) computed tomography angiography (CTA) allows to rule out obstructive CAD, interpreting hemodynamic significance of intermediate stenoses is challenging. This study investigates the incremental value of CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), quantitative coronary plaque characteristics (e.g., stenosis degree, plaque volume, and composition), and peri-coronary adipose tissue (PCAT) density to detect hemodynamically significant lesions among those with AS and CAD.
We included patients with severe AS and intermediate coronary lesions (20-80% diameter stenosis) who underwent pre-TAVR CTA and invasive coronary angiogram (ICA) with resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) assessment between 08/16 and 04/22. CTA image analysis included assessment of CT-FFR, quantitative coronary plaque analysis, and PCAT density. Coronary lesions with RFR ≤ 0.89 indicated hemodynamic significance as reference standard.
Overall, 87 patients (age 77.9 ± 7.4 years, 38% female) with 95 intermediate coronary artery lesions were included. CT-FFR showed good discriminatory capacity (area under receiver operator curve (AUC) = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.96, p < 0.001) to identify hemodynamically significant lesions, superior to anatomical assessment, plaque morphology, and PCAT density. Plaque composition and PCAT density did not differ between lesions with and without hemodynamic significance. Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed CT-FFR as the only predictor for functionally significant lesions (odds ratio 1.28 (95% CI 1.17-1.43), p < 0.001). Overall, CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 showed diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 88.4% (95%CI 80.2-94.1), 78.5% (95%CI 63.2-89.7), and 96.2% (95%CI 87.0-99.5), respectively.
CT-FFR was superior to CT anatomical, plaque morphology, and PCAT assessment to detect functionally significant stenoses in patients with severe AS.
CT-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis may be a useful tool for non-invasive hemodynamic assessment of intermediate coronary lesions, while CT anatomical, plaque morphology, and peri-coronary adipose tissue assessment have no incremental or additional benefit. These findings might help to reduce pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement invasive coronary angiogram.
• Interpreting the hemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary stenoses is challenging in pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement CT. • CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) has a good discriminatory capacity in the identification of hemodynamically significant coronary lesions. • CT-derived anatomical, plaque morphology, and peri-coronary adipose tissue assessment did not improve the diagnostic capability of CT-FFR in the hemodynamic assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)与严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)常并存。虽然经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)前计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)可排除阻塞性CAD,但解读中度狭窄的血流动力学意义具有挑战性。本研究探讨CT衍生的血流储备分数(CT-FFR)、定量冠状动脉斑块特征(如狭窄程度、斑块体积和成分)以及冠状动脉周围脂肪组织(PCAT)密度在检测AS和CAD患者中血流动力学显著病变方面的增量价值。
我们纳入了在08/16至04/22期间接受TAVR前CTA和有静息全周期比率(RFR)评估的侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)的重度AS和中度冠状动脉病变(直径狭窄20%-80%)患者。CTA图像分析包括CT-FFR评估、定量冠状动脉斑块分析和PCAT密度评估。以RFR≤0.89的冠状动脉病变表示血流动力学显著意义作为参考标准。
总体而言,纳入了87例患者(年龄77.9±7.4岁,38%为女性),共有95处中度冠状动脉病变。CT-FFR在识别血流动力学显著病变方面显示出良好的鉴别能力(受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)=0.89,95%置信区间(CI)0.81-0.96,p<0.001),优于解剖学评估、斑块形态和PCAT密度。有血流动力学意义和无血流动力学意义的病变之间斑块成分和PCAT密度无差异。单变量和多变量分析显示CT-FFR是功能显著病变的唯一预测因子(比值比1.28(95%CI 1.17-1.43),p<0.001)。总体而言,CT-FFR≤0.80的诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为88.4%(95%CI 80.2-94.1)、78.5%(95%CI 63.2-89.7)和96.2%(95%CI 87.0-99.5)。
在重度AS患者中,CT-FFR在检测功能显著狭窄方面优于CT解剖学、斑块形态和PCAT评估。
重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的CT衍生血流储备分数可能是用于中度冠状动脉病变无创血流动力学评估的有用工具,而CT解剖学、斑块形态和冠状动脉周围脂肪组织评估没有增量或额外益处。这些发现可能有助于减少经导管主动脉瓣置换术前的侵入性冠状动脉造影。
• 在经导管主动脉瓣置换术CT中解读中度冠状动脉狭窄的血流动力学意义具有挑战性。• CT衍生的血流储备分数(CT-FFR)在识别血流动力学显著冠状动脉病变方面具有良好的鉴别能力。• CT衍生的解剖学、斑块形态和冠状动脉周围脂肪组织评估在中度冠状动脉狭窄的血流动力学评估中未提高CT-FFR的诊断能力。