Bayram Yusuf, Pınar Ertuğrul
Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Neurological Surgery, Special Pendik Yuzyil Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 9;15(12):e50210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50210. eCollection 2023 Dec.
This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of the information for patients from YouTube videos on transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF).
One hundred videos were listed by inputting "TLIF," "TLIF surgery," and "transforaminal interbody fusion" in the YouTube search engine. The top 50 most popular videos based on video power index (VPI), view ratio, and exclusion criteria were selected for review. One orthopedic consultant surgeon and one neurosurgeon consultant analyzed the videos together. The modified DISCERN score, the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, and a novel interbody fusion score were used to evaluate videos. Data of video length, view count, number of likes and dislikes, like ratio (like x 100/(like+dislike)), video source, and comment rate were collected.
The quality of the videos could have been better according to all scoring systems, regardless of the video source. The scores of the videos published by patients and commercials were significantly lower than those of physicians and allied professionals (p <0.05). VPI and view ratios were similar in all sources. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that YouTube videos providing information related to TLIF surgery are available and accessed by the public. The results of this study would suggest that YouTube is not currently an appropriate source of information on TLIF surgery for patients. Most of the YouTube videos about TLIF surgery contain information about the surgical technique and have limited information about the post-operative condition of the patients.
本研究旨在评估来自YouTube上关于经椎间孔椎间融合术(TLIF)视频中患者信息的质量和可靠性。
在YouTube搜索引擎中输入“TLIF”“TLIF手术”和“经椎间孔椎间融合术”,列出100个视频。根据视频功率指数(VPI)、观看比例和排除标准,选择最受欢迎的前50个视频进行审查。一名骨科顾问外科医生和一名神经外科顾问共同分析这些视频。使用改良的DISCERN评分、全球质量评分(GQS)、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分和一种新的椎间融合评分来评估视频。收集视频长度、观看次数、点赞和点踩数量、点赞比例(点赞数×100/(点赞数+点踩数))、视频来源和评论率的数据。
根据所有评分系统,无论视频来源如何,视频质量都有待提高。患者和商业机构发布的视频得分显著低于医生和相关专业人员发布的视频(p<0.05)。所有来源的VPI和观看比例相似。结论:该研究表明,YouTube上提供与TLIF手术相关信息的视频可供公众获取。本研究结果表明,目前YouTube并非患者获取TLIF手术信息的合适来源。大多数关于TLIF手术的YouTube视频包含手术技术信息,而关于患者术后情况的信息有限。