Suppr超能文献

评估YouTube作为经椎间孔椎间融合术信息来源的质量和可靠性。

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube as an Information Source for Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.

作者信息

Bayram Yusuf, Pınar Ertuğrul

机构信息

Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.

Neurological Surgery, Special Pendik Yuzyil Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Dec 9;15(12):e50210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50210. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of the information for patients from YouTube videos on transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred videos were listed by inputting "TLIF," "TLIF surgery," and "transforaminal interbody fusion" in the YouTube search engine. The top 50 most popular videos based on video power index (VPI), view ratio, and exclusion criteria were selected for review. One orthopedic consultant surgeon and one neurosurgeon consultant analyzed the videos together. The modified DISCERN score, the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, and a novel interbody fusion score were used to evaluate videos. Data of video length, view count, number of likes and dislikes, like ratio (like x 100/(like+dislike)), video source, and comment rate were collected.

RESULTS

The quality of the videos could have been better according to all scoring systems, regardless of the video source. The scores of the videos published by patients and commercials were significantly lower than those of physicians and allied professionals (p <0.05). VPI and view ratios were similar in all sources.  Conclusion: The study demonstrates that YouTube videos providing information related to TLIF surgery are available and accessed by the public. The results of this study would suggest that YouTube is not currently an appropriate source of information on TLIF surgery for patients. Most of the YouTube videos about TLIF surgery contain information about the surgical technique and have limited information about the post-operative condition of the patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估来自YouTube上关于经椎间孔椎间融合术(TLIF)视频中患者信息的质量和可靠性。

材料与方法

在YouTube搜索引擎中输入“TLIF”“TLIF手术”和“经椎间孔椎间融合术”,列出100个视频。根据视频功率指数(VPI)、观看比例和排除标准,选择最受欢迎的前50个视频进行审查。一名骨科顾问外科医生和一名神经外科顾问共同分析这些视频。使用改良的DISCERN评分、全球质量评分(GQS)、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分和一种新的椎间融合评分来评估视频。收集视频长度、观看次数、点赞和点踩数量、点赞比例(点赞数×100/(点赞数+点踩数))、视频来源和评论率的数据。

结果

根据所有评分系统,无论视频来源如何,视频质量都有待提高。患者和商业机构发布的视频得分显著低于医生和相关专业人员发布的视频(p<0.05)。所有来源的VPI和观看比例相似。结论:该研究表明,YouTube上提供与TLIF手术相关信息的视频可供公众获取。本研究结果表明,目前YouTube并非患者获取TLIF手术信息的合适来源。大多数关于TLIF手术的YouTube视频包含手术技术信息,而关于患者术后情况的信息有限。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube as an Information Source for Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 9;15(12):e50210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50210. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
3
Quality Assessment of YouTube Content on SLAP Tears.
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Dec;51(6):582-589. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2147805. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Shared on YouTube.
J Wrist Surg. 2021 Sep 6;11(4):295-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735231. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022 Sep;45(7):748-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
8
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
TLIF Online Videos for Patient Education-Evaluation of Comprehensiveness, Quality, and Reliability.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4626. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054626.
10
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of YouTube videos on post-dural puncture headache: a cross-sectional study.
PeerJ. 2025 Mar 19;13:e19151. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19151. eCollection 2025.
2
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos on Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for Cancer Using a Newly Developed Tool.
Integr Cancer Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15347354241293417. doi: 10.1177/15347354241293417.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment.
J Endod. 2023 Feb;49(2):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
2
The quality and reliability analysis of YouTube videos about insulin resistance.
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104960. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104960. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Quality Assessment of YouTube Content on SLAP Tears.
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Dec;51(6):582-589. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2147805. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis.
Spine Deform. 2023 Jan;11(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00569-7. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
5
YouTube videos provide low-quality educational content about rotator cuff disease.
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Sep;25(3):217-223. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00927. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
9
A quality assessment of YouTube content on shoulder instability.
Phys Sportsmed. 2022 Aug;50(4):289-294. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2021.1942286. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
The videos on YouTube® related to hallux valgus surgery have insufficient information.
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jun;28(4):414-417. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验