Suppr超能文献

医院环境中测量健康素养和数字健康素养的评估工具:一项范围综述

Assessment Tools for Measuring Health Literacy and Digital Health Literacy in a Hospital Setting: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Dijkman Eline M, Ter Brake Wouter W M, Drossaert Constance H C, Doggen Carine J M

机构信息

Department of Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 20;12(1):11. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010011.

Abstract

Assessment of (digital) health literacy in the hospital can raise staff awareness and facilitate tailored communication, leading to improved health outcomes. Assessment tools should ideally address multiple domains of health literacy, fit to the complex hospital context and have a short administration time, to enable routine assessment. This review aims to create an overview of tools for measuring (digital) health literacy in hospitals. A search in Scopus, PubMed, WoS and CINAHL, following PRISMA guidelines, generated 7252 hits; 251 studies were included in which 44 assessment tools were used. Most tools (57%) were self-reported and 27% reported an administration time of <5 min. Almost all tools addressed the domain 'understanding' (98%), followed by 'access' (52%), 'apply' (50%), 'appraise' (32%), 'numeracy' (18%), and 'digital' (18%). Only four tools were frequently used: the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy for Adults ((S)TOFHLA), the Brief Health Literacy Screener (BHLS), and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). While the NVS and BHLS have a low administration time, they cover only two domains. HLQ covers the most domains: access, understanding, appraise, and apply. None of these four most frequently used tools measured digital skills. This review can guide health professionals in choosing an instrument that is feasible in their daily practice, and measures the required domains.

摘要

在医院评估(数字)健康素养可以提高工作人员的意识,并促进针对性的沟通,从而改善健康结果。理想情况下,评估工具应涵盖健康素养的多个领域,适应复杂的医院环境,并且管理时间较短,以便进行常规评估。本综述旨在概述医院中测量(数字)健康素养的工具。按照PRISMA指南在Scopus、PubMed、WoS和CINAHL中进行检索,共获得7252条记录;纳入了251项研究,其中使用了44种评估工具。大多数工具(57%)采用自我报告方式,27%的工具报告管理时间<5分钟。几乎所有工具都涉及“理解”领域(98%),其次是“获取”(52%)、“应用”(50%)、“评估”(32%)、“算术能力”(18%)和“数字”(18%)。只有四种工具经常被使用:最新生命体征量表(NVS)、成人功能性健康素养简短测试((S)TOFHLA)、简短健康素养筛查工具(BHLS)和健康素养问卷(HLQ)。虽然NVS和BHLS管理时间较短,但它们仅涵盖两个领域。HLQ涵盖的领域最多:获取、理解、评估和应用。这四种最常用的工具都没有测量数字技能。本综述可以指导卫生专业人员选择在日常实践中可行且能测量所需领域的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f50/10778720/e003e86479d9/healthcare-12-00011-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验