Suppr超能文献

一项针对癌症幸存者治疗后阶段生活质量的健康生活方式干预措施的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of healthy lifestyle interventions addressing quality of life of cancer survivors in the post treatment phase.

作者信息

Leske Morgan, Galanis Christina, Koczwara Bogda, Beatty Lisa

机构信息

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun;19(3):940-956. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01514-x. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study's primary aim was to investigate whether including a mental health component to healthy lifestyle interventions are associated with greater effects on quality of life (QoL) for post-treatment cancer survivors than addressing physical activity and/or nutrition alone.

METHODS

PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched to identify randomised control trials of healthy lifestyle interventions for post-treatment cancer survivors, with a usual care or waitlist control, and measured QoL. Meta-analyses quantified the effects of interventions vs controls at post-treatment on total QoL, physical, emotional, and social well-being. Subgroup analyses compared interventions with vs without a mental health component, modes of delivery, and duration. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight papers evaluating 110 interventions were included: 66 effect sizes were extracted for meta-analysis, and 22 papers were narratively synthesised. The pooled effect size demonstrated a small, significant effect of healthy lifestyle interventions in comparison to control for all QoL outcomes (total g = 0.32, p >.001; physical g = 0.19, p = 0.05; emotional g = 0.20, p >.001; social g = 0.18, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between interventions with vs without a mental health component. Face-to-face delivered interventions were associated with greater total QoL and physical well-being compared to other modalities. Interventions delivered ≤12 weeks were associated with greater physical well-being than those delivered ≥13 weeks. Overall, studies had substantial levels of heterogeneity and 55.9% demonstrated high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Participating in a healthy lifestyle intervention following cancer treatment improves QoL. Few trials addressed mental health or evaluated online or telephone modalities; future research should develop and evaluate interventions that utilise these features.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Brief healthy lifestyle interventions can be recommended for cancer survivors, particularly those interested in improving physical well-being.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是调查,与仅针对身体活动和/或营养的干预措施相比,在健康生活方式干预中纳入心理健康成分是否对癌症治疗后幸存者的生活质量(QoL)有更大影响。

方法

检索了PsycINFO、Scopus、Medline、CINAHL和谷歌学术,以确定针对癌症治疗后幸存者的健康生活方式干预的随机对照试验,这些试验设置了常规护理或等待名单对照,并对生活质量进行了测量。荟萃分析量化了治疗后干预措施与对照措施对总体生活质量、身体、情感和社会幸福感的影响。亚组分析比较了有无心理健康成分的干预措施、提供方式和持续时间。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2评估纳入研究的质量。

结果

纳入了88篇评估110项干预措施的论文:提取了66个效应量用于荟萃分析,22篇论文进行了叙述性综合分析。汇总效应量表明,与对照相比,健康生活方式干预对所有生活质量结果均有小的显著影响(总体g = 0.32,p>.001;身体g = 0.19,p = 0.05;情感g = 0.20,p>.001;社会g = 0.18,p = 0.01)。有无心理健康成分的干预措施之间没有显著差异。与其他方式相比,面对面实施的干预措施与更高的总体生活质量和身体幸福感相关。实施≤12周的干预措施比实施≥13周的干预措施与更高的身体幸福感相关。总体而言,研究存在大量异质性,55.9%显示出高偏倚风险。

结论

癌症治疗后参与健康生活方式干预可改善生活质量。很少有试验涉及心理健康或评估在线或电话方式;未来的研究应开发和评估利用这些特点的干预措施。

对癌症幸存者的启示

可以向癌症幸存者推荐简短的健康生活方式干预,特别是那些对改善身体健康感兴趣的人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/934b/12081566/cbba20ebbd22/11764_2023_1514_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验