Gu Xia, Jiang Shimin, Yang Yue, Li Wenge
China-Japan Friendship Hospital (institute of Clinical Medical Sciences), Chinese academy of Medical Sciences & Peking union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Nephrology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Jan 11;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01251-2.
To assess the effects of finerenone and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and the relative cardiovascular benefits in patients with or without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease for different outcomes with these classes of drugs.
We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1, 2000, to December 30, 2022, to identify randomized controlled trials. The primary outcomes were the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death (MACE); hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); and a composite of renal outcomes. The results were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
In total, we identified 11 trials and 73,927 participants, 13,847 (18.7%) in finerenone trials and 60,080 (81.3%) in GLP1-RA trials. Finerenone reduced the risk of MACE by 13% (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95; P = 0.003), while GLP1-RA reduced the risk in a similar magnitude by 13% (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.92; P < 0.001). For both drug classes, the effect on lowering the risk of MACE was restricted to approximately 14% in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90; P < 0.001), whereas no effect was observed in patients without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.02; P = 0.12). GLP1-RA reduced myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death more than finerenone (which appeared to have no effect). Only finerenone was beneficial for reducing the risk of HHF (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.92; P = 0.003). Both finerenone (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92; P < 0.001) and GLP1-RA (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86; P < 0.001) reduced the risk of kidney disease progression, including macroalbuminuria, and finerenone was superior to GLP1-RA in delaying deterioration of kidney function.
Finerenone and GLP1-RA lead to a risk reduction in MACE to a similar degree in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. For both drug classes, the effect on lowering the risk of progression of kidney disease was also in a similar magnitude in patients with T2DM, whereas only finerenone had a significant protective effect against HHF. Treatment decisions for patients with T2DM should consider the clinical benefit profiles of each drug.
评估非奈利酮和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP1-RA)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者心血管和肾脏结局的影响,以及在有或无已确诊动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的患者中,这些药物类别对不同结局的相对心血管益处。
我们检索了2000年1月1日至2022年12月30日期间的PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase,以确定随机对照试验。主要结局为非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中和心血管死亡的复合结局(MACE);因心力衰竭住院(HHF);以及肾脏结局的复合结局。结果以风险比(HRs)及95%置信区间(CIs)报告。
我们共纳入了11项试验和73927名参与者,其中非奈利酮试验中有13847名(18.7%),GLP1-RA试验中有60080名(81.3%)。非奈利酮使MACE风险降低了13%(HR,0.87;95%CI,0.79-0.95;P = 0.003),而GLP1-RA使风险降低了相似幅度的13%(HR,0.87;95%CI,0.83-0.92;P < 0.001)。对于这两类药物,在已确诊动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的患者中,降低MACE风险的效果约为14%(HR,0.86;95%CI,0.82-***;P < 0.001),而在无已确诊动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的患者中未观察到效果(HR,0.93;95%CI,0.85-1.02;P = 0.12)。GLP1-RA比非奈利酮更能降低心肌梗死、卒中和心血管死亡风险(非奈利酮似乎无此效果)。仅非奈利酮对降低HHF风险有益(HR,0.78;95%CI,0.66-0.92;P = 0.003)。非奈利酮(HR,0.84;95%CI,0.77-0.92;P < 0.001)和GLP1-RA(HR,0.81;95%CI,0.76-0.86;P < 0.001)均降低了肾病进展风险,包括大量蛋白尿,且非奈利酮在延缓肾功能恶化方面优于GLP1-RA。
在已确诊动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的患者中,非奈利酮和GLP1-RA降低MACE风险的程度相似。对于这两类药物,在T2DM患者中降低肾病进展风险的效果也相似,而仅非奈利酮对HHF有显著保护作用。T2DM患者的治疗决策应考虑每种药物的临床获益情况。