Evaluation of the accuracy of an augmented reality-based tumor-targeting guide for breast-conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used for breast tumor detection, significant challenges remain in determining and presenting the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of tumors to guide breast-conserving surgery. To address this challenge, we have developed the augmented reality-breast surgery guide (AR-BSG) and compared its performance with that of a traditional 3D-printed breast surgical guide (3DP-BSG).

METHODS

Based on the MRI results of a breast cancer patient, a breast phantom made of skin, body, and tumor was fabricated through 3D printing and silicone-casting. AR-BSG and 3DP-BSG were executed using surgical plans based on the breast phantom's computed tomography scan images. Three operators independently inserted a catheter into the phantom using each guide. Their targeting accuracy was then evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis with limits of agreement (LoA). Differences between the users of each guide were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The entry and end point errors associated with AR-BSG were -0.34±0.68 mm (LoA: -1.71-1.01 mm) and 0.81±1.88 mm (LoA: -4.60-3.00 mm), respectively, whereas 3DP-BSG was associated with entry and end point errors of -0.28±0.70 mm (LoA: -1.69-1.11 mm) and -0.62±1.24 mm (LoA: -3.00-1.80 mm), respectively. The AR-BSG's entry and end point ICC values were 0.99 and 0.97, respectively, whereas 3DP-BSG was associated with entry and end point ICC values of 0.99 and 0.99, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AR-BSG can consistently and accurately localize tumor margins for surgeons without inferior guiding accuracy AR-BSG can consistently and accurately localize tumor margins for surgeons without inferior guiding accuracy compared to 3DP-BSG. Additionally, when compared with 3DP-BSG, AR-BSG can offer better spatial perception and visualization, lower costs, and a shorter setup time.