Butler James J, Hartman Hayden, Rettig Samantha, Konar Kishore, Randall Grace, Samsonov Alan P, Kennedy John G
Foot and Ankle Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, 171 Delancey St, 2nd floor, New York City, USA.
School of Medicine, University of Buckingham, United Kingdom.
Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 Jun;30(4):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.01.003. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients undergoing scarf osteotomy and scarf-Akin osteotomy for the management of hallux valgus deformity.
A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting clinical data following scarf osteotomy and scarf-Akin osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus were included and assessed. The level and quality of evidence of the included studies were also evaluated.
Four studies were included. In total, 388 patients (408 toes) underwent scarf osteotomy alone and 287 patients (295 toes) underwent scarf-Akin osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. There was no difference in postoperative American orthopedic foot and ankle society scores (p = 0.7828), visual analog scale scores (p = 0.4558), hallux valgus angle (p = 0.5116), intermetatarsal angle (p = 0.4830), proximal to distal phalangeal articular angle (p = 0.2411) between the scarf alone cohort and the scarf-Akin cohort. Similarly, there was no difference in complication rates (p = 0.6881) nor secondary surgical procedure rates (p = 0.3678) between the 2 cohorts. Finally, there was a higher recurrence rate in the scarf-alone cohort (11.4%) compared to the scarf-Akin cohort (5.7%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.4414).
This systematic review demonstrates lower recurrence rates following scarf-Akin osteotomy compared to scarf osteotomy alone for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. No difference in complication rates were noted between the 2 cohorts. Our review demonstrates that both the scarf osteotomy and the scarf-Akin osteotomy may be effective and safe procedures, however, the scarf-Akin osteotomy may provide more long-term benefit in the setting of moderate to severe hallux valgus.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是比较采用斯卡夫截骨术和斯卡夫-艾金截骨术治疗拇外翻畸形患者的临床和影像学结果。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统评价。纳入并评估报告采用斯卡夫截骨术和斯卡夫-艾金截骨术治疗拇外翻后临床数据的研究。还对纳入研究的证据水平和质量进行了评估。
纳入4项研究。共有388例患者(408个足趾)单独接受了斯卡夫截骨术,287例患者(295个足趾)接受了斯卡夫-艾金截骨术治疗拇外翻畸形。单独斯卡夫截骨术组和斯卡夫-艾金截骨术组之间,术后美国矫形足踝协会评分(p = 0.7828)、视觉模拟量表评分(p = 0.4558)、拇外翻角度(p = 0.5116)、跖骨间角度(p = 0.4830)、近节趾骨与远节趾骨关节角度(p = 0.2411)均无差异。同样,两组之间的并发症发生率(p = 0.6881)和二次手术率(p = 0.3678)也无差异。最后,单独斯卡夫截骨术组的复发率(11.4%)高于斯卡夫-艾金截骨术组(5.7%),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.4414)。
本系统评价表明,与单独采用斯卡夫截骨术治疗拇外翻畸形相比,采用斯卡夫-艾金截骨术的复发率更低。两组之间并发症发生率无差异。我们的评价表明,斯卡夫截骨术和斯卡夫-艾金截骨术可能都是有效且安全的手术方法,然而,在中重度拇外翻的情况下,斯卡夫-艾金截骨术可能具有更多的长期益处。