Pharmaco- and Device Epidemiology Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina, Barcelona, Spain.
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Mar;12(3):225-236. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00414-9. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
Although vaccines have proved effective to prevent severe COVID-19, their effect on preventing long-term symptoms is not yet fully understood. We aimed to evaluate the overall effect of vaccination to prevent long COVID symptoms and assess comparative effectiveness of the most used vaccines (ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2).
We conducted a staggered cohort study using primary care records from the UK (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD] GOLD and AURUM), Catalonia, Spain (Information System for Research in Primary Care [SIDIAP]), and national health insurance claims from Estonia (CORIVA database). All adults who were registered for at least 180 days as of Jan 4, 2021 (the UK), Feb 20, 2021 (Spain), and Jan 28, 2021 (Estonia) comprised the source population. Vaccination status was used as a time-varying exposure, staggered by vaccine rollout period. Vaccinated people were further classified by vaccine brand according to their first dose received. The primary outcome definition of long COVID was defined as having at least one of 25 WHO-listed symptoms between 90 and 365 days after the date of a PCR-positive test or clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, with no history of that symptom 180 days before SARS-Cov-2 infection. Propensity score overlap weighting was applied separately for each cohort to minimise confounding. Sub-distribution hazard ratios (sHRs) were calculated to estimate vaccine effectiveness against long COVID, and empirically calibrated using negative control outcomes. Random effects meta-analyses across staggered cohorts were conducted to pool overall effect estimates.
A total of 1 618 395 (CPRD GOLD), 5 729 800 (CPRD AURUM), 2 744 821 (SIDIAP), and 77 603 (CORIVA) vaccinated people and 1 640 371 (CPRD GOLD), 5 860 564 (CPRD AURUM), 2 588 518 (SIDIAP), and 302 267 (CORIVA) unvaccinated people were included. Compared with unvaccinated people, overall HRs for long COVID symptoms in people vaccinated with a first dose of any COVID-19 vaccine were 0·54 (95% CI 0·44-0·67) in CPRD GOLD, 0·48 (0·34-0·68) in CPRD AURUM, 0·71 (0·55-0·91) in SIDIAP, and 0·59 (0·40-0·87) in CORIVA. A slightly stronger preventative effect was seen for the first dose of BNT162b2 than for ChAdOx1 (sHR 0·85 [0·60-1·20] in CPRD GOLD and 0·84 [0·74-0·94] in CPRD AURUM).
Vaccination against COVID-19 consistently reduced the risk of long COVID symptoms, which highlights the importance of vaccination to prevent persistent COVID-19 symptoms, particularly in adults.
National Institute for Health and Care Research.
尽管疫苗已被证明能有效预防严重的 COVID-19,但它们对预防长期症状的效果尚未完全了解。我们旨在评估接种疫苗预防长新冠症状的总体效果,并评估最常用疫苗(ChAdOx1 和 BNT162b2)的相对有效性。
我们使用来自英国(临床实践研究数据链接 [CPRD] GOLD 和 AURUM)、西班牙加泰罗尼亚(初级保健研究信息系统 [SIDIAP])和爱沙尼亚国家健康保险索赔数据(CORIVA 数据库)的初级保健记录开展了一项交错队列研究。截至 2021 年 1 月 4 日(英国)、2 月 20 日(西班牙)和 1 月 28 日(爱沙尼亚),所有至少注册 180 天的成年人均纳入原始人群。疫苗接种状况被用作随时间变化的暴露因素,并根据疫苗推出时间错开。根据他们接受的第一剂疫苗,接种疫苗的人进一步根据疫苗品牌进行分类。长新冠的主要定义是在 PCR 阳性检测或 COVID-19 临床诊断后 90 至 365 天之间至少出现 25 项世卫组织列出的症状之一,且在 SARS-CoV-2 感染前 180 天没有该症状的病史。分别为每个队列应用倾向评分重叠加权,以尽量减少混杂因素。使用阴性对照结果对亚分布风险比(sHR)进行了经验校准,以估计疫苗对长新冠的有效性。在交错队列中进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以汇总总体效果估计值。
共纳入 1618395 名(CPRD GOLD)、5729800 名(CPRD AURUM)、2744821 名(SIDIAP)和 77603 名(CORIVA)接种者和 1640371 名(CPRD GOLD)、5860564 名(CPRD AURUM)、2588518 名(SIDIAP)和 302267 名(CORIVA)未接种者。与未接种者相比,任何 COVID-19 疫苗首剂接种者的长新冠症状的总体 HR 在 CPRD GOLD 中为 0.54(95%CI 0.44-0.67),在 CPRD AURUM 中为 0.48(0.34-0.68),在 SIDIAP 中为 0.71(0.55-0.91),在 CORIVA 中为 0.59(0.40-0.87)。BNT162b2 的首剂预防效果略强于 ChAdOx1(CPRD GOLD 中为 0.85[0.60-1.20],CPRD AURUM 中为 0.84[0.74-0.94])。
接种 COVID-19 疫苗可降低长新冠症状的风险,这突显了接种疫苗预防持续 COVID-19 症状的重要性,尤其是在成年人中。
国家卫生与保健研究所。