Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3706-3724. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02326-8. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
The construct of personal control is crucial for understanding a variety of human behaviors. Perceived lack of control affects performance and psychological well-being in diverse contexts - educational, organizational, clinical, and social. Thus, it is important to know to what extent we can rely on the established experimental manipulations of (lack of) control. In this article, we examine the construct validity of recall-based manipulations of control (or lack thereof). Using existing datasets (Study 1a and 1b: N = 627 and N = 454, respectively) we performed content-based analyses of control experiences induced by two different procedures (free recall and positive events recall). The results indicate low comparability between high and low control conditions in terms of the emotionality of a recalled event, the domain and sphere of control, amongst other differences. In an experimental study that included three types of recall-based control manipulations (Study 2: N = 506), we found that the conditions differed not only in emotionality but also in a generalized sense of control. This suggests that different aspects of personal control can be activated, and other constructs evoked, depending on the experimental procedure. We discuss potential sources of variability between control manipulation procedures and propose improvements in practices when using experimental manipulations of sense of control and other psychological constructs.
个人控制感的构建对于理解各种人类行为至关重要。在不同的背景下,如教育、组织、临床和社会,感知到的缺乏控制感会影响表现和心理健康。因此,了解我们在多大程度上可以依赖既定的(缺乏)控制感的实验操纵是很重要的。在本文中,我们检验了基于回忆的控制感操纵(或缺乏控制感操纵)的构念效度。使用现有的数据集(研究 1a 和 1b:N = 627 和 N = 454),我们对两种不同程序(自由回忆和积极事件回忆)引起的控制感体验进行了基于内容的分析。结果表明,在回忆事件的情绪性、控制的领域和范围等方面,高控制条件和低控制条件之间的可比性较低。在一项包括三种基于回忆的控制感操纵的实验研究中(研究 2:N = 506),我们发现这些条件不仅在情绪性方面存在差异,而且在控制感的一般意义上也存在差异。这表明可以根据实验程序激活个人控制的不同方面,并引发其他结构。我们讨论了控制操纵程序之间的潜在变异性来源,并提出了在使用控制感和其他心理结构的实验操纵时改进实践的建议。