Kuehn Rebecca, Fox Tilly, Guyatt Gordon, Lutje Vittoria, Gould Susan
Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Department of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;4(1):e0002731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002731. eCollection 2024.
To make inferences regarding the effectiveness of respiratory interventions and case isolation measures in reducing or preventing the transmission of mpox based on synthesis of available literature.
The WHO Clinical Management and Infection Prevention and Control 2022 guideline and droplet precautions in healthcare facilities and home isolation infection prevention control measures for patients with mpox. We conducted a systematic review that included a broad search of five electronic databases. In a two-stage process, we initially sought only randomized controlled trials and observational comparative studies; when the search failed to yield eligible studies, the subsequent search included all study designs including clinical and environmental sampling studies.
No studies were identified that directly addressed airborne and droplet precautions and home isolation infection prevention control measures. To inform the review questions the review team synthesized route of transmission data in mpox. There were 2366/4309 (54.9%) cases in which investigators identified mpox infection occurring following transmission through direct physical sexual contact. There were no reported mpox cases in which investigators identified inhalation as a single route of transmission. There were 2/4309 cases in which investigators identified fomite as a single route of transmission. Clinical and environmental sampling studies isolated mpox virus in a minority of saliva, oropharangeal swabs, mpox skin lesions, and hospital room air.
Current findings provide compelling evidence that transmission of mpox occurs through direct physical contact. Because investigators have not reported any cases of transmission via inhalation alone, the impact of airborne and droplet infection prevention control measures in reducing transmission will be minimal. Avoiding physical contact with others, covering mpox lesions and wearing a medical mask is likely to reduce onward mpox transmission; there may be minimal reduction in transmission from additionally physically isolating patients with mild disease at home.
基于现有文献的综合分析,推断呼吸干预措施和病例隔离措施在减少或预防猴痘传播方面的有效性。
参考世界卫生组织《2022年临床管理与感染预防控制指南》以及医疗机构中的飞沫预防措施和猴痘患者家庭隔离感染预防控制措施。我们进行了一项系统综述,对五个电子数据库进行了广泛检索。在一个两阶段的过程中,我们最初仅寻找随机对照试验和观察性比较研究;当检索未能找到符合条件的研究时,后续检索包括所有研究设计,包括临床和环境采样研究。
未找到直接涉及空气传播和飞沫预防措施以及家庭隔离感染预防控制措施的研究。为了回答综述问题,综述团队综合了猴痘的传播途径数据。在2366/4309例(54.9%)病例中,研究人员确定猴痘感染是通过直接性接触传播的。没有报告称研究人员将吸入确定为单一传播途径的猴痘病例。在4309例病例中有2例,研究人员将污染物确定为单一传播途径。临床和环境采样研究在少数唾液、口咽拭子、猴痘皮肤病变和医院病房空气中分离出猴痘病毒。
目前的研究结果提供了有力证据,表明猴痘通过直接身体接触传播。由于研究人员尚未报告任何仅通过吸入传播的病例,空气传播和飞沫感染预防控制措施在减少传播方面的影响将微乎其微。避免与他人进行身体接触、遮盖猴痘病变并佩戴医用口罩可能会减少猴痘的进一步传播;对轻症患者进行额外的家庭物理隔离可能对传播的减少作用极小。