Labori Knut Jørgen, Bratlie Svein Olav, Andersson Bodil, Angelsen Jon-Helge, Biörserud Christina, Björnsson Bergthor, Bringeland Erling Audun, Elander Nils, Garresori Herish, Grønbech Jon Erik, Haux Johan, Hemmingsson Oskar, Liljefors Maria Gustafsson, Myklebust Tor Åge, Nymo Linn Såve, Peltola Katriina, Pfeiffer Per, Sallinen Ville, Sandström Per, Sparrelid Ernesto, Stenvold Helge, Søreide Kjetil, Tingstedt Bobby, Verbeke Caroline, Öhlund Daniel, Klint Leif, Dueland Svein, Lassen Kristoffer
Department of Hepato Pancreato Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;9(3):205-217. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00405-3. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
In patients undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer, adjuvant modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) improves overall survival compared with alternative chemotherapy regimens. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX with the standard strategy of upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
NORPACT-1 was a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 12 hospitals in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1, and had a resectable tumour of the pancreatic head radiologically strongly suspected to be pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Participants were randomly assigned (3:2 before October, 2018, and 1:1 after) to the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group or upfront surgery group. Patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group received four neoadjuvant cycles of FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m, irinotecan 180 mg/m, leucovorin 400 mg/m, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m bolus then 2400 mg/m over 46 h on day 1 of each 14-day cycle), followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients in the upfront surgery group underwent surgery and then received adjuvant chemotherapy. Initially, adjuvant chemotherapy was gemcitabine plus capecitabine (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle and capecitabine 830 mg/m twice daily for 3 weeks with 1 week of rest in each 28-day cycle; four cycles in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group, six cycles in the upfront surgery group). A protocol amendment was subsequently made to permit use of adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m, irinotecan 150 mg/m, leucovorin 400 mg/m, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m over 46 h on day 1 of each 14-day cycle; eight cycles in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group, 12 cycles in the upfront surgery group). Randomisation was performed with a computerised algorithm that stratified for each participating centre and used a concealed block size of two to six. Patients, investigators, and study team members were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival at 18 months. Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol populations. Safety was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02919787, and EudraCT, 2015-001635-21, and is ongoing.
Between Feb 8, 2017, and April 21, 2021, 77 patients were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and 63 to undergo upfront surgery. All patients were included in the ITT analysis. For the per-protocol analysis, 17 (22%) patients were excluded from the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group (ten did not receive neoadjuvant therapy, four did not have pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and three received another neoadjuvant regimen), and eight (13%) were excluded from the upfront surgery group (seven did not have pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and one did not undergo surgical exploration). 61 (79%) of 77 patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group received neoadjuvant therapy. The proportion of patients alive at 18 months by ITT was 60% (95% CI 49-71) in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group versus 73% (62-84) in the upfront surgery group (p=0·032), and median overall survival by ITT was 25·1 months (95% CI 17·2-34·9) versus 38·5 months (27·6-not reached; hazard ratio [HR] 1·52 [95% CI 1·00-2·33], log-rank p=0·050). The proportion of patients alive at 18 months in per-protocol analysis was 57% (95% CI 46-67) in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group versus 70% (55-83) in the upfront surgery group (p=0·14), and median overall survival in per-protocol population was 23·0 months (95% CI 16·2-34·9) versus 34·4 months (19·4-not reached; HR 1·46 [95% CI 0·99-2·17], log-rank p=0·058). In the safety population, 42 (58%) of 73 patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group and 19 (40%) of 47 patients in the upfront surgery group had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event. 63 (82%) of 77 patients in the neoadjuvant group and 56 (89%) of 63 patients in the upfront surgery group had resection (p=0·24). One sudden death of unknown cause and one COVID-19-related death occurred after the first cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated in 51 (86%) of 59 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group and 44 (90%) of 49 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the upfront surgery group (p=0·56). Adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX was given to 13 (25%) patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group and 19 (43%) patients in the upfront surgery group. During adjuvant chemotherapy, neutropenia (11 [22%] patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group and five [11%] in the upfront surgery group) was the most common grade 3 or worse adverse event.
This phase 2 trial did not show a survival benefit from neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma compared with upfront surgery. Implementation of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was challenging. Future trials on treatment sequencing in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma should be biomarker driven.
Norwegian Cancer Society, South Eastern Norwegian Health Authority, The Sjöberg Foundation, and Helsinki University Hospital Research Grants.
在接受胰腺癌切除术的患者中,与其他化疗方案相比,辅助性改良氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、伊立替康和奥沙利铂(FOLFIRINOX)可提高总生存率。我们旨在比较新辅助FOLFIRINOX与可切除性胰腺导管腺癌患者先行手术的标准策略的疗效和安全性。
NORPACT-1是一项在丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的12家医院进行的多中心、随机、2期试验。符合条件的患者年龄在18岁及以上,世界卫生组织体能状态为0或1,且有影像学高度怀疑为胰腺腺癌的可切除胰头肿瘤。参与者被随机分配(2018年10月之前为3:2,之后为1:1)至新辅助FOLFIRINOX组或先行手术组。新辅助FOLFIRINOX组的患者接受四个周期的新辅助FOLFIRINOX治疗(奥沙利铂85mg/m²、伊立替康180mg/m²、亚叶酸钙400mg/m²,氟尿嘧啶400mg/m²静脉推注,然后在每个14天周期的第1天46小时内持续输注2400mg/m²),随后进行手术和辅助化疗。先行手术组的患者先进行手术,然后接受辅助化疗。最初,辅助化疗为吉西他滨加卡培他滨(每个28天周期的第1、8和15天,吉西他滨1000mg/m²静脉滴注30分钟,卡培他滨830mg/m²每日两次,共3周,每28天周期休息1周;新辅助FOLFIRINOX组四个周期,先行手术组六个周期)。随后对方案进行了修订,允许使用辅助性改良FOLFIRINOX(每个14天周期的第1天,奥沙利铂85mg/m²、伊立替康150mg/m²、亚叶酸钙400mg/m²,氟尿嘧啶2400mg/m²在46小时内持续输注;新辅助FOLFIRINOX组八个周期,先行手术组12个周期)。使用计算机算法进行随机分组,该算法按每个参与中心进行分层,并采用2至6的隐蔽分组大小。患者、研究者和研究团队成员未对治疗分配进行设盲。主要终点是18个月时的总生存率。在意向性治疗(ITT)人群和符合方案人群中进行分析。对所有随机分组并接受至少一个周期新辅助或辅助治疗的患者进行安全性评估。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02919787)和EudraCT(2015-001635-21)注册,目前正在进行中。
在2017年2月8日至2021年4月21日期间,77例患者被随机分配接受新辅助FOLFIRINOX治疗,63例接受先行手术。所有患者均纳入ITT分析。在符合方案分析中,新辅助FOLFIRINOX组有17例(22%)患者被排除(10例未接受新辅助治疗,4例不是胰腺导管腺癌,3例接受了其他新辅助方案),先行手术组有8例(13%)患者被排除(7例不是胰腺导管腺癌,1例未进行手术探查)。新辅助FOLFIRINOX组的77例患者中有61例(79%)接受了新辅助治疗。ITT分析中,新辅助FOLFIRINOX组18个月时的存活患者比例为60%(95%CI 49-71),先行手术组为73%(62-84)(p=0.032),ITT分析的中位总生存期分别为25.1个月(95%CI 17.2-34.9)和38.5个月(27.6-未达到;风险比[HR]1.52[95%CI 1.00-2.33],对数秩检验p=0.050)。符合方案分析中,新辅助FOLFIRINOX组18个月时的存活患者比例为57%(95%CI 46-67),先行手术组为70%(55-83)(p=0.14),符合方案人群的中位总生存期分别为23.0个月(95%CI 16.2-34.9)和34.4个月(19.4-未达到;HR 1.46[95%CI 0.99-2.17],对数秩检验p=0.058)。在安全性人群中,新辅助FOLFIRINOX组的73例患者中有42例(58%),先行手术组的47例患者中有19例(40%)发生了至少1次3级或更严重的不良事件。新辅助组的77例患者中有63例(82%)、先行手术组的63例患者中有56例(89%)进行了切除(p=0.24)。在新辅助FOLFIRINOX的第一个周期后,发生了1例不明原因的猝死和1例与COVID-19相关的死亡。新辅助FOLFIRINOX组中59例切除胰腺导管腺癌的患者中有51例(86%)、先行手术组中49例切除胰腺导管腺癌的患者中有44例(90%)开始了辅助化疗(p=0.56)。新辅助FOLFIRINOX组有13例(25%)患者、先行手术组有19例(43%)患者接受了辅助性改良FOLFIRINOX。在辅助化疗期间,中性粒细胞减少(新辅助FOLFIRINOX组11例[22%]患者,先行手术组5例[11%]患者)是最常见的3级或更严重的不良事件。
这项2期试验未显示与先行手术相比,新辅助FOLFIRINOX在可切除性胰腺导管腺癌患者中具有生存获益。实施新辅助FOLFIRINOX具有挑战性。未来关于可切除性胰腺导管腺癌治疗顺序的试验应以生物标志物为导向。
挪威癌症协会、挪威东南部卫生局、舍贝里基金会和赫尔辛基大学医院研究基金。