Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1452-1462. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13012. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
Maternal input plays an important role in influencing linguistic development during the first years of life, and it is evident that mothers adapt their language according to their child's characteristics. Recently, it was demonstrated that maternal input addressed to children with sex chromosome trisomies (SCTs) at 8 months of age is prosodically and functionally different from that addressed to typically developing (TD) peers.
The study aimed at analysing maternal input at 24 months when the presence of a language delay could be more evident than during the preverbal stage. We were interested in examining if maternal input was influenced by a diagnosis of SCT (by comparing children with SCT and TD children) or by children's linguistic level (by comparing children with weak lexical ability versus children with typical lexical ability regardless of the presence of genetic diagnosis).
Forty-four mother-child dyads in which the children had an SCT and 20 mother-child dyads in which the children were TD participated in the study. Of these 64 dyads, 23 children (21 with SCTs and two TD children) formed the group of children with weak lexical ability (children with a vocabulary size lower than 50 words at 24 months). Maternal utterances were collected during one video-recorded play session and were then coded considering both the linguistic and functional features of the input.
The results showed that the input addressed to 24-month-old children with SCTs is as rich and complex as that addressed to TD peers. Moreover, no significant differences in the functions expressed by maternal input were found (all p > 0.05). Comparing the children with weak lexical ability and the children with typical lexical ability in our sample, having a poor vocabulary at 24 months of age showed a significant influence on the maternal input features: the input addressed to children with weak lexical ability was characterised by a higher presence of attention getters (U = 217.00, p = 0.007) and a lower proportion of questions (U = 236.00, p = 0.017) than that of mothers of typically-talking children.
At 24 months of age, it seems that the presence of a language delay and not belonging to the clinical group of children with SCTs influences the functional characteristics of the maternal input. It is important to support the parents of children with SCTs during the communication process and later during their child's development, leading them to observe their children's manifested skills rather than looking for possible predicted difficulties.
What is already known on the subject Studies in the literature demonstrated how mothers can generally adapt their input to their child's characteristics. To our knowledge, only two recent studies analysed the maternal input addressed to children with SCT at 8 months of age, highlighting significant differences. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The maternal input addressed to children with SCT at 24 months of age is not different from that addressed to TD children. At 24 months of age, the mothers adapt their input to the verbal competence shown by their child (weak lexical ability versus typically-talking), while belonging to the clinical group does not show an influence. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? All the participants of the present study received prenatal diagnosis disclosure by an expert team of professionals, and they were all involved in a longitudinal study aimed at monitoring the children's development and supporting their parents. These results show that giving clear and complete information about possible development paths to parents of children with SCTs during diagnosis disclosure is crucial. Moreover, supporting the parents during the communication process and later during their child's development is fundamental, leading them to observe their children's manifested skills rather than looking for possible predicted difficulties.
母体输入在影响生命最初几年的语言发展方面起着重要作用,很明显,母亲会根据孩子的特点调整自己的语言。最近,研究表明,8 个月大的性染色体三体(SCT)儿童的母体输入在韵律和功能上与典型发育(TD)同龄儿童的母体输入不同。
本研究旨在分析 24 个月大的儿童的母体输入,此时语言延迟的存在可能比前语言阶段更为明显。我们感兴趣的是,检查母体输入是否受到 SCT 诊断(通过比较 SCT 儿童和 TD 儿童)或儿童语言水平(通过比较词汇能力较弱的儿童与词汇能力典型的儿童,无论是否存在遗传诊断)的影响。
44 名患有 SCT 的母婴对子和 20 名患有 TD 的母婴对子参加了这项研究。在这 64 对母子中,23 名儿童(21 名患有 SCT,2 名 TD 儿童)组成了词汇能力较弱的儿童组(24 个月时词汇量低于 50 个单词的儿童)。在一次视频记录的游戏中收集了母亲的话语,然后考虑输入的语言和功能特征对其进行了编码。
结果表明,24 个月大的 SCT 儿童的输入与 TD 同龄人一样丰富和复杂。此外,母语输入所表达的功能没有显著差异(均 p > 0.05)。在我们的样本中,将词汇能力较弱的儿童与词汇能力典型的儿童进行比较,发现 24 个月时词汇量较差对母体输入特征有显著影响:词汇能力较弱的儿童的输入中,注意力吸引者的比例更高(U = 217.00,p = 0.007),问题的比例更低(U = 236.00,p = 0.017)。与典型说话儿童的母亲相比。
在 24 个月大时,似乎语言延迟的存在而不是属于 SCT 儿童的临床组会影响母体输入的功能特征。在交流过程中和儿童发育后,为 SCT 儿童的父母提供支持很重要,引导他们观察自己孩子表现出的技能,而不是寻找可能预测的困难。
文献研究表明,母亲通常可以根据孩子的特点调整自己的输入。据我们所知,只有最近的两项研究分析了 8 个月大的 SCT 儿童的母体输入,强调了显著的差异。本研究的意义在于,24 个月大的 SCT 儿童的母体输入与 TD 儿童的母体输入没有区别。在 24 个月大时,母亲会根据孩子的言语能力(词汇能力较弱与典型说话)调整输入,而属于临床组则不会产生影响。本研究的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?本研究的所有参与者都接受了专业团队的产前诊断披露,并都参与了一项旨在监测儿童发育和支持其父母的纵向研究。这些结果表明,在进行诊断披露时,向 SCT 儿童的父母提供关于可能发展路径的清晰和完整信息至关重要。此外,在沟通过程中和儿童发育期间为父母提供支持非常重要,引导他们观察自己孩子表现出的技能,而不是寻找可能预测的困难。