Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Centre of Interprofessional Collaboration within Emergency care (CICE), Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 18;25(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01002-6.
It is a common ethical challenge for ambulance clinicians to care for patients with impaired decision-making capacities while assessing and determining the degree of decision-making ability and considering ethical values. Ambulance clinicians' ethical competence seems to be increasingly important in coping with such varied ethical dilemmas. Ethics rounds is a model designed to promote the development of ethical competence among clinicians. While standard in other contexts, to the best of our knowledge, it has not been applied within the ambulance service context. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe ambulance clinicians' experiences of participating in ethics rounds.
This was a qualitative descriptive study, evaluating an intervention. Data were collected through sixteen interviews with ambulance clinicians who had participated in an intervention involving ethics rounds. The analysis was performed by use of content analysis.
Two themes describe the participants' experiences: (1) Reflecting freely within a given framework, and (2) Being surprised by new insights. The following categories form the basis of the themes; 1a) Gentle guidance by the facilitator, 1b) A comprehensible structure, 2a) New awareness in the face of ethical problems, and 2b) Shared learning through dialogue.
Incorporating structured ethics rounds seems to create a continuous development in ethical competence that may improve the quality of care in the ambulance service. Structured guidance and facilitated group reflections offer ambulance clinicians opportunities for both personal and professional development. An important prerequisite for the development of ethical competence is a well-educated facilitator. Consequently, this type of ethics rounds may be considered a useful pedagogical model for the development of ethical competence in the ambulance service.
在评估和确定决策能力程度并考虑伦理价值观时,救护临床医生照顾决策能力受损的患者是一个常见的伦理挑战。救护临床医生的伦理能力似乎在应对这种多样化的伦理困境中变得越来越重要。伦理查房是一种旨在促进临床医生伦理能力发展的模式。虽然在其他背景下是标准的,但据我们所知,它尚未在救护服务背景下应用。因此,本研究的目的是描述救护临床医生参与伦理查房的经验。
这是一项定性描述性研究,评估一项干预措施。通过对 16 名参与涉及伦理查房干预措施的救护临床医生进行访谈来收集数据。分析采用内容分析法进行。
两个主题描述了参与者的经验:(1)在给定框架内自由思考,(2)对新见解感到惊讶。以下类别构成主题的基础:1a)主持人的温和指导,1b)可理解的结构,2a)面对伦理问题时的新认识,2b)通过对话进行的共同学习。
将结构化的伦理查房纳入其中似乎会在伦理能力方面不断发展,从而提高救护服务的护理质量。结构化的指导和促进小组反思为救护临床医生提供了个人和职业发展的机会。伦理能力发展的一个重要前提是有受过良好教育的主持人。因此,这种类型的伦理查房可以被视为发展救护服务中伦理能力的有用教学模式。