Suppr超能文献

危重症儿童的早期康复:一项两中心实施研究。

Early Rehabilitation in Critically ill Children: A Two Center Implementation Study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;25(2):92-105. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003343. Epub 2024 Jan 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To implement an early rehabilitation bundle in two Canadian PICUs.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Implementation study in the PICUs at McMaster Children's Hospital (site 1) and London Health Sciences (site 2).

PATIENTS

All children under 18 years old admitted to the PICU were eligible for the intervention.

INTERVENTIONS

A bundle consisting of: 1) analgesia-first sedation; 2) delirium monitoring and prevention; and 3) early mobilization.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Primary outcomes were the duration of implementation, bundle compliance, process of care, safety, and the factors influencing implementation. Secondary endpoints were the impact of the bundle on clinical outcomes such as pain, delirium, iatrogenic withdrawal, ventilator-free days, length of stay, and mortality. Implementation occurred over 26 months (August 2018 to October 2020). Data were collected on 1,036 patients representing 4,065 patient days. Bundle compliance was optimized within 6 months of roll-out. Goal setting for mobilization and level of arousal improved significantly (p < 0.01). Benzodiazepine, opioid, and dexmedetomidine use decreased in site 1 by 23.2% (95% CI, 30.8-15.5%), 26.1% (95% CI, 34.8-17.4%), and 9.2% (95% CI, 18.2-0.2%) patient exposure days, respectively, while at site 2, only dexmedetomidine exposure decreased significantly by 10.5% patient days (95% CI, 19.8-1.1%). Patient comfort, safety, and nursing workload were not adversely affected. There was no significant impact of the bundle on the rate of delirium, ventilator-free days, length of PICU stay, or mortality. Key facilitators to implementation included institutional support, unit-wide practice guidelines, dedicated PICU educators, easily accessible resources, and family engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

A rehabilitation bundle can improve processes of care and reduce patient sedative exposure without increasing patient discomfort, nursing workload, or harm. We did not observe an impact on short-term clinical outcomes. The efficacy of a PICU-rehabilitation bundle requires ongoing study. Lessons learned in this study provide evidence to inform rehabilitation implementation in the PICU setting.

摘要

目的

在加拿大的两个 PICUs 实施早期康复套餐。

设计和设置

麦克马斯特儿童医院(site1)和伦敦健康科学中心(site2)的 PICUs 中的实施研究。

患者

所有 18 岁以下入住 PICUs 的儿童均符合干预条件。

干预措施

包括以下内容的一揽子计划:1)镇痛优先镇静;2)谵妄监测和预防;3)早期动员。

测量和主要结果

主要结果是实施时间、套餐依从性、护理过程、安全性以及影响实施的因素。次要终点是套餐对疼痛、谵妄、医源性停药、无呼吸机天数、住院时间和死亡率等临床结果的影响。实施工作于 2018 年 8 月至 2020 年 10 月进行了 26 个月。共收集了 1036 名患者的数据,代表了 4065 名患者的住院天数。推出后 6 个月内,套餐的依从性得到了优化。运动和觉醒目标设定明显改善(p < 0.01)。苯二氮䓬类、阿片类和右美托咪定的使用在 site1 中分别减少了 23.2%(95%CI,30.8-15.5%)、26.1%(95%CI,34.8-17.4%)和 9.2%(95%CI,18.2-0.2%)的患者暴露天数,而在 site2 中,只有右美托咪定的使用显著减少了 10.5%的患者天数(95%CI,19.8-1.1%)。患者舒适度、安全性和护理工作量没有受到不利影响。该套餐对谵妄发生率、无呼吸机天数、PICU 住院时间或死亡率没有显著影响。实施的关键促进因素包括机构支持、全院实践指南、专门的 PICU 教育者、易于获取的资源和家庭参与。

结论

康复套餐可改善护理过程并减少患者镇静剂暴露,同时不会增加患者不适、护理工作量或造成伤害。我们没有观察到短期临床结果的影响。PICU 康复套餐的疗效需要进一步研究。本研究中吸取的经验教训为在 PICU 环境中实施康复提供了证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验