Gould Ashley, Lewis Lesley, Evans Lowri, Greening Leanne, Howe-Davies Holly, West Jonathan, Roberts Chris, Parkinson John A
Public Health Wales, Cardif CF10 4BZ, UK.
Somerset Council, Somerset TA1 4DY, UK.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jan 17;14(1):63. doi: 10.3390/bs14010063.
Within the context of reopening society in the summer of 2021, as the UK moved away from 'lockdowns', the Government of Wales piloted the return of organized 'mass gatherings' of people at a number of test events. The current study reports behavioral observations that were made at two of the test events to inform this process. The researchers were particularly interested in four key factors: how (1) context within a venue, (2) environmental design, (3) staffing and social norms, and (4) time across an event, affected the personal protective behaviors of social distancing and face-covering use. Data collection was undertaken by trained observers. Adherence to protective behaviors was generally high, but there is clear evidence that these behaviors were shaped in a systematic way by the environment, situational cues, and the passage of time during the events. Some instances of large-scale non-adherence to personal protective behaviors were documented. An analysis within a dual-process framework suggests ways to understand and respond to supporting target health behaviors in groups of people where intervention is deemed valuable, such as in complex or ambiguous contexts. This is one of the first studies to include a 'true' behavioral measure in understanding human responses to COVID-19. It demonstrates that behavioral observations can add precision and granularity to understanding human behavior in complex real-world contexts. Given the significant physical and mental health burden created acutely and chronically by COVID-19, this work has implications for how governments and organizations support target populations in other complex challenges facing us today, such as in sustainability, and healthy lifestyle behaviors. An individual's intentions are not always matched by their actions, and so the findings support a balanced liberal paternalistic approach where system-level changes support appropriate individual-level decisions to engender collective responsibility and action.
在2021年夏天英国重新开放社会、逐步摆脱“封锁”的背景下,威尔士政府在一系列测试活动中试行让人们进行有组织的“大规模聚集”。本研究报告了在其中两次测试活动中所做的行为观察,以为这一过程提供信息。研究人员特别关注四个关键因素:(1)场所内的环境、(2)环境设计、(3)人员配备和社会规范,以及(4)活动期间的时间,如何影响社交距离和佩戴口罩等个人防护行为。数据收集由经过培训的观察员进行。对防护行为的遵守情况总体较高,但有明确证据表明,这些行为在活动期间受到环境、情境线索和时间推移的系统性影响。记录了一些大规模不遵守个人防护行为的情况。在双过程框架内的分析提出了一些方法,以理解和应对在被认为有必要进行干预的人群中支持目标健康行为的问题,比如在复杂或模糊的情境中。这是首批在理解人类对新冠疫情的反应时纳入“真实”行为测量的研究之一。它表明行为观察可以为理解复杂现实世界背景下的人类行为增添精确性和细致性。鉴于新冠疫情造成的严重急性和慢性身心健康负担,这项工作对于政府和组织如何在我们如今面临的其他复杂挑战(如可持续性和健康生活方式行为)中支持目标人群具有启示意义。个人的意图并不总是与行动相符,因此研究结果支持一种平衡的自由家长式做法,即系统层面的变革支持适当的个人层面决策,以产生集体责任和行动。