Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Rutgers Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Mar 1;184(3):242-251. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6986.
Use of buprenorphine or methadone to treat opioid use disorder is recommended in pregnancy; however, their teratogenic potential is largely unknown.
To compare the risk of congenital malformations following in utero exposure to buprenorphine vs methadone.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study used health care utilization data from publicly insured Medicaid beneficiaries in the US from 2000 to 2018. A total of 13 360 pregnancies with enrollment from 90 days prior to pregnancy start through 1 month after delivery and first trimester use of buprenorphine or methadone were included and linked to infants. Data were analyzed from July to December 2022.
A pharmacy dispensing of buprenorphine or a code for administration of methadone in the first trimester.
Primary outcomes included major malformations overall and malformations previously associated with opioids (any cardiac malformations, ventricular septal defect, secundum atrial septal defect/nonprematurity-related patent foramen ovale, neural tube defects, clubfoot, and oral clefts). Secondary outcomes included other organ system-specific malformations. Risk differences and risk ratios (RRs) were estimated comparing buprenorphine with methadone, adjusting for confounders with propensity score overlap weights.
The cohort included 9514 pregnancies with first-trimester buprenorphine exposure (mean [SD] maternal age, 28.4 [4.6] years) and 3846 with methadone exposure (mean [SD] maternal age, 28.8 [4.7] years). The risk of malformations overall was 50.9 (95% CI, 46.5-55.3) per 1000 pregnancies for buprenorphine and 60.6 (95% CI, 53.0-68.1) per 1000 pregnancies for methadone. After confounding adjustment, buprenorphine was associated with a lower risk of malformations compared with methadone (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Risk was lower with buprenorphine for cardiac malformations (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85), including both ventricular septal defect (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98) and secundum atrial septal defect/nonprematurity-related patent foramen ovale (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97), oral clefts (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35-1.19), and clubfoot (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94). Results for neural tube defects were uncertain given low event counts. In secondary analyses, buprenorphine was associated with a decreased risk of central nervous system, urinary, and limb malformations but a greater risk of gastrointestinal malformations compared with methadone. These findings were consistent in sensitivity and bias analyses.
In this cohort study, the risk of most malformations previously associated with opioid exposure was lower in buprenorphine-exposed infants compared with methadone-exposed infants, independent of measured confounders. Malformation risk is one factor that informs the individualized patient decision regarding medications for opioid use disorder in pregnancy.
在怀孕期间,使用丁丙诺啡或美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍是被推荐的;然而,其致畸潜力在很大程度上是未知的。
比较子宫内暴露于丁丙诺啡与美沙酮后先天性畸形的风险。
设计、设置和参与者:这项基于人群的队列研究使用了美国公共医疗补助受益人从怀孕前 90 天至分娩后 1 个月期间的医疗保健利用数据,共纳入了 13360 例怀孕病例,这些病例在妊娠开始前 90 天至分娩后 1 个月内首次使用丁丙诺啡或美沙酮,并与婴儿相关联。数据于 2022 年 7 月至 12 月进行分析。
在妊娠早期,丁丙诺啡药房配药或美沙酮管理的代码。
主要结局包括总体主要畸形和先前与阿片类药物相关的畸形(任何心脏畸形、室间隔缺损、继发房间隔缺损/非早产相关卵圆孔未闭、神经管缺陷、马蹄足和口腔裂)。次要结局包括其他器官系统特定的畸形。使用倾向评分重叠权重对混杂因素进行调整后,比较丁丙诺啡与美沙酮,估计风险差异和风险比(RR)。
该队列包括 9514 例妊娠早期暴露于丁丙诺啡(平均[标准差]母亲年龄,28.4[4.6]岁)和 3846 例妊娠早期暴露于美沙酮(平均[标准差]母亲年龄,28.8[4.7]岁)。丁丙诺啡的畸形总风险为每 1000 例妊娠 50.9(95%CI,46.5-55.3),美沙酮为每 1000 例妊娠 60.6(95%CI,53.0-68.1)。在混杂因素调整后,与美沙酮相比,丁丙诺啡与畸形风险降低相关(RR,0.82;95%CI,0.69-0.97)。与美沙酮相比,丁丙诺啡的心脏畸形风险较低(RR,0.63;95%CI,0.47-0.85),包括室间隔缺损(RR,0.62;95%CI,0.39-0.98)和继发房间隔缺损/非早产相关卵圆孔未闭(RR,0.54;95%CI,0.30-0.97)、口腔裂(RR,0.65;95%CI,0.35-1.19)和马蹄足(RR,0.55;95%CI,0.32-0.94)。神经管缺陷的结果存在不确定性,因为事件计数较低。在二次分析中,与美沙酮相比,丁丙诺啡与较低的中枢神经系统、泌尿系统和肢体畸形风险相关,但与美沙酮相比,胃肠道畸形风险较高。这些发现在敏感性和偏差分析中是一致的。
在这项队列研究中,与美沙酮暴露的婴儿相比,子宫内暴露于丁丙诺啡的婴儿先前与阿片类药物暴露相关的大多数畸形的风险较低,独立于测量的混杂因素。畸形风险是告知患者在怀孕期间使用阿片类药物治疗障碍时关于药物选择的个体化患者决策的一个因素。