Pereira Mário José, André Alexandra, Monteiro Mário, Castro Maria António, Mendes Rui, Martins Fernando, Gomes Ricardo, Vaz Vasco, Dias Gonçalo
Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, 3000-214 Coimbra, Portugal.
Coimbra Health School, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 17;12(2):229. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020229.
The benefits of Pilates have been extensively researched for their impact on muscular, psychological, and cardiac health, as well as body composition, among other aspects. This study aims to investigate the influence of the Pilates method on the learning process, motor control, and neuromuscular trunk stabilization, specifically in both experienced and inexperienced practitioners. This semi-randomized controlled trial compares the level of experience among 36 Pilates practitioners in terms of motor control and learning of two Pilates-based skills: standing plank and side crisscross. Data will be collected using various assessment methods, including abdominal wall muscle ultrasound (AWMUS), shear wave elastography (SWE), gaze behavior (GA) assessment, electroencephalography (EEG), and video motion. Significant intra- and inter-individual variations are expected, due to the diverse morphological and psychomotor profiles in the sample. The adoption of both linear and non-linear analyses will provide a comprehensive evaluation of how neuromuscular structures evolve over time and space, offering both quantitative and qualitative insights. Non-linear analysis is expected to reveal higher entropy in the expert group compared to non-experts, signifying greater complexity in their motor control. In terms of stability, experts are likely to exhibit higher Lyapunov exponent values, indicating enhanced stability and coordination, along with lower Hurst exponent values. In elastography, experienced practitioners are expected to display higher transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle elasticity, due to their proficiency. Concerning GA, non-experts are expected to demonstrate more saccades, focus on more Areas of Interest (AOIs), and shorter fixation times, as experts are presumed to have more efficient gaze control. In EEG, we anticipate higher theta wave values in the non-expert group compared to the expert group. These expectations draw from similar studies in elastography and correlated research in eye tracking and EEG. They are consistent with the principles of the Pilates Method and other scientific knowledge in related techniques.
普拉提对肌肉、心理和心脏健康以及身体成分等方面的益处已得到广泛研究。本研究旨在调查普拉提方法对学习过程、运动控制和神经肌肉躯干稳定性的影响,特别是针对有经验和无经验的从业者。这项半随机对照试验比较了36名普拉提练习者在运动控制和两项基于普拉提的技能(站立平板支撑和侧交叉)学习方面的经验水平。将使用多种评估方法收集数据,包括腹壁肌肉超声(AWMUS)、剪切波弹性成像(SWE)、注视行为(GA)评估、脑电图(EEG)和视频运动分析。由于样本中存在不同的形态和心理运动特征,预计个体内部和个体之间会有显著差异。采用线性和非线性分析将全面评估神经肌肉结构如何随时间和空间演变,提供定量和定性的见解。预计与非专家相比,专家组的非线性分析将显示出更高的熵,这表明他们的运动控制更复杂。在稳定性方面,专家可能表现出更高的李雅普诺夫指数值,表明稳定性和协调性增强,同时赫斯特指数值较低。在弹性成像中,由于经验丰富的从业者技术熟练,预计他们的腹横肌(TrA)弹性更高。关于注视行为,预计非专家会表现出更多的扫视、关注更多的感兴趣区域(AOI)且注视时间更短,因为专家被认为具有更有效的注视控制。在脑电图方面,预计非专家组的θ波值高于专家组。这些预期源于弹性成像方面的类似研究以及眼动追踪和脑电图方面的相关研究。它们与普拉提方法的原则以及相关技术中的其他科学知识一致。