Low Response Rate to Follow-Up Using Telemedicine after Total Knee Replacement during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the survival rate and medium-term outcomes of patients after cemented posterior-stabilized (PS) mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a telemedicine platform during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive patients (mean age 73.5 ± 13.2 years) who received a cemented PS MB TKA were enrolled. The mean age of patients who did not complete the telemedicine follow-up (58%) was 75.8 ± 9.7 years. A dedicated software that makes it possible to perform video calls, online questionnaires, and acquire X-rays remotely was used. Subjective clinical scores and objective range-of-motion (ROM) measurements were observed at an average follow-up of 54 ± 11.3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 42 of 100 enrolled patients (mean age 70.3 ± 8.4 years) completed the telemedicine follow-up. The mean age of patients who did not complete the telemedicine follow-up (58%) was 75.8 ± 9.7 years. Age was found to be a statistically significant difference between the group that completed the telemedicine follow-up and the one that did not ( < 0.004). KOOS scores improved from 56.1 ± 11.3 to 77.4 ± 16.2, VAS scores decreased from 7.2 ± 2.1 to 2.8 ± 1.6, KSSf scores increased from 47.2 ± 13.3 to 77.1 ± 21.1, FJS scores improved from 43.4 ± 12.3 to 76.9 ± 22.9, and OKS scores increased from 31.9 ± 8.8 to 40.4 ± 9.9. All the differences were statistically significant ( < 0.05). The mean flexion improved from 88° ± 8° to 120° ± 12°. A radiographic evaluation showed a mean pre-operative mechanical axis deviation of 5.3 ± 8.0 degrees in varus, which improved to 0.4 ± 3.4 degrees of valgus post-operation. The survivorship at 5 years was 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Subject to small numbers, telemedicine presented as a useful instrument for performing remote monitoring after TKA. The most important factor in telemedicine success remains the patient's skill, which is usually age-related, as older patients have much more difficulty in approaching a technological tool.