Thomas Julie K, Colbert-Getz Jorie, Bonnett Rachel, Sakaeda Mariah, Hurtado Jessica M, Chow Candace
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Apr-May;37(2):149-159. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2298860. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
Medical schools must equip future physicians to provide equitable patient care. The best approach, however, is mainly dependent on a medical school's context. Graduating students from our institution have reported feeling ill-equipped to care for patients from "different backgrounds" on the Association of American Medical Colleges' Graduation Questionnaire. We explored how medical students interpret "different patient backgrounds" and what they need to feel prepared to care for diverse patients.
We conducted an exploratory qualitative case study using focus groups with 11, Year 2 (MS2) and Year 4 (MS4) medical students at our institution. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded using thematic analysis. We used Bobbie Harro's cycles of socialization and liberation to understand how the entire medical school experience, not solely the curriculum, informs how medical students learn to interact with all patients.
We organized our findings into four major themes to characterize students' medical education experience when learning to care for patients of different backgrounds: (1) Understandings of different backgrounds (prior to medical school); (2) Admissions process; (3) Curricular socialization; and (4) Co-curricular (or environmental) socialization. We further divided themes 2, 3, and 4 into two subthemes when learning how to care for patients of different backgrounds: (a) the current state and (b) proposed changes. We anticipate that following the proposed changes will help students feel more prepared to care for patients of differing backgrounds.
Our findings show that preparing medical students to care for diverse patient populations requires a multitude of intentional changes throughout medical students' education. Using Harro's cycles of socialization and liberation as an analytic lens, we identified multiple places throughout medical students' educational experience that are barriers to learning how to care for diverse populations. We propose changes within medical students' education that build upon each other to adequately prepare students to care for patients of diverse backgrounds. Each proposed change culminates into a systemic shift within an academic institution and requires an intentional commitment by administration, faculty, admissions, curriculum, and student affairs.
医学院校必须培养未来的医生,使其能够提供公平的患者护理。然而,最佳方法主要取决于医学院校的具体情况。在美国医学院协会的毕业调查问卷中,我校的毕业生表示,他们感觉自己在护理“背景不同”的患者时准备不足。我们探讨了医学生如何理解“不同的患者背景”,以及他们需要什么才能做好护理不同患者的准备。
我们在本校对11名二年级(医学硕士2年级)和四年级(医学硕士4年级)医学生进行了焦点小组访谈,开展了一项探索性定性案例研究。对焦点小组访谈进行录音、转录,并采用主题分析法进行编码。我们运用博比·哈罗的社会化与解放循环理论,来理解整个医学院校经历(而非仅仅课程设置)如何影响医学生学习与所有患者互动的方式。
我们将研究结果归纳为四个主要主题,以描述医学生在学习护理不同背景患者时的医学教育经历:(1)对不同背景的理解(医学院校学习之前);(2)招生过程;(3)课程社会化;(4)课外(或环境)社会化。在学习如何护理不同背景患者时,我们进一步将主题2、3和4细分为两个子主题:(a)现状;(b)建议的改变。我们预计,实施建议的改变将有助于学生更有准备地护理背景不同的患者。
我们的研究结果表明,要让医学生做好护理不同患者群体的准备,需要在医学生的整个教育过程中进行诸多有意的改变。以哈罗的社会化与解放循环理论为分析视角,我们在医学生的教育经历中发现了多个阻碍他们学习如何护理不同群体患者的地方。我们建议在医学生的教育过程中进行一系列相互关联的改变,以使学生充分做好护理不同背景患者的准备。每项建议的改变最终会在学术机构内引发系统性转变,这需要行政部门、教师、招生部门、课程设置和学生事务部门做出有意的承诺。