Department of Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences.
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):3993-3999. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000754.
Imaging-estimated tumour extent after neoadjuvant chemotherapy tends to be discordant with the pathological extent. The authors aimed to prospectively determine the proportion of decisions regarding total mastectomy for potential breast-conserving surgery candidates owing to false size prediction with imaging in neoadjuvant chemotherapy and non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients.
The authors prospectively enroled clinical stage II or III breast cancer patients who are scheduled for total mastectomy between 2018 and 2021. This study was conducted at Seoul National University Hospital at South Korea. Before surgery, each surgeon recorded the hypothetical maximum tumour size at which the surgeon would have been able to attempt breast-conserving surgery if the patient had actually less than the size of the tumour at that location in the breast. After surgery, the hypothetical maximum tumour size was compared with the final pathologic total extent of the tumour, including invasive and in situ cancers.
Among the 360 enroled patients, 130 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 230 did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of the total of each group, 47.7% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 21.3% in the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy group had a smaller pathologic tumour extent than the pre-recorded hypothetical maximum tumour size (P<0.001). Further analyses were conducted for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. The proportions of total mastectomy with false size prediction were higher in HER2-positive (63.3%) and triple-negative (57.6%) patients compared with ER-positive/HER2-negative (25.0%) patients (P<0.001). Both magnetic resonance imaging-pathology and ultrasonography-pathology size discrepancies were significantly associated with false decisions for total mastectomy (both P<0.001). Without magnetic resonance imaging, the false decision may be reduced by 21.5%.
A total of 47.7% of patients who received total mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were breast-conserving surgery eligible, which was significantly higher than that of non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients. Magnetic resonance imaging contributed the most to false size predictions.
新辅助化疗后影像学估计的肿瘤范围往往与病理范围不一致。作者旨在前瞻性确定由于影像学对新辅助化疗和非新辅助化疗患者的肿瘤大小预测错误,而对潜在保乳手术候选者行全乳切除术的决定比例。
作者前瞻性招募了 2018 年至 2021 年间计划行全乳切除术的临床 II 期或 III 期乳腺癌患者。本研究在韩国首尔国立大学医院进行。在手术前,每位外科医生记录了如果患者乳房中该部位的肿瘤实际小于记录的假设最大肿瘤大小,外科医生能够尝试保乳手术的假设最大肿瘤大小。手术后,将假设的最大肿瘤大小与包括浸润性癌和原位癌在内的肿瘤的最终病理总范围进行比较。
在 360 名入组患者中,130 名患者接受了新辅助化疗,230 名患者未接受新辅助化疗。在每组中,新辅助化疗组的 47.7%和非新辅助化疗组的 21.3%患者的病理肿瘤范围小于预记录的假设最大肿瘤大小(P<0.001)。对新辅助化疗组进行了进一步分析。与 ER 阳性/HER2 阴性(25.0%)患者相比,HER2 阳性(63.3%)和三阴性(57.6%)患者的全乳切除术因假尺寸预测而更高(P<0.001)。磁共振成像-病理和超声-病理大小差异均与全乳切除术的错误决策显著相关(均 P<0.001)。如果没有磁共振成像,假决策的可能性会降低 21.5%。
新辅助化疗后接受全乳切除术的患者中,47.7%有资格行保乳手术,明显高于非新辅助化疗患者。磁共振成像对假尺寸预测的贡献最大。