Perez Andres R, Coladonato Carlo, Sonnier John Hayden, Saucedo Samuel T, Avendano John P, Corvi John, Campbell Mike, Tjoumakaris Fotios P, Cohen Steven B, Ciccotti Michael C, Freedman Kevin B
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 1;6(1):100849. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100849. eCollection 2024 Feb.
To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to compare the prevalence of articular cartilage damage in patients with a single patellar dislocation versus those with multiple dislocations and to compare the locations and severity of chondral injury between the groups.
Patients with patellar dislocation between January 2017 and July 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patients with a documented history of patellar dislocation and an MRI scan of the affected knee were included. Patients with articular cartilage injury prior to the dislocation event were excluded. Articular cartilage injury was graded using a validated system: AMADEUS (Mean Total Area Measurement and Depth & Underlying Structures). Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI) scores and Dejour classifications of trochlear dysplasia were also collected. Data were calculated by performing tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and χ or Fisher Exact tests to calculate values for categorical data.
In total, 233 patients were included: 117 with primary dislocations and 116 with recurrent dislocations. Articular cartilage injuries were present in 51 patients with primary dislocations (43.6%) and 68 patients with recurrent dislocations (58.6%, = .026). On comparison of the groups, the recurrent group contained a significantly larger proportion of female patients (65.5% vs 46.2%, = .004). There was no difference in lesion size, subchondral bone defect, presence of bone edema, or total AMADEUS score between groups ( = .231). Caton-Deschamps Index scores were not significant when comparing between groups; however, the Dejour classifications showed higher grades in the recurrent group ( = .013 for A-D grading scale and = .005 for high/low grading scale). Subgroup analysis revealed that when cartilage damage was present, patients from the primary group had significantly more full-thickness lesions ( < .001) and lower AMADEUS scores ( = .016).
There was a similarly high prevalence of cartilage injury seen on MRI after both a primary patellar dislocation and a recurrent patellar dislocation. Chondral injury primarily affected the medial and lateral patellar facets and the lateral femoral condyle in both the primary and recurrent dislocation groups. However, the primary group showed an increased number of full-thickness lesions. There was no difference in lesion size, subchondral bone defect, presence of bone edema, or total AMADEUS score between the primary and recurrent groups.
Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic investigation.
利用磁共振成像(MRI)扫描比较首次髌骨脱位患者与多次脱位患者关节软骨损伤的患病率,并比较两组之间软骨损伤的部位和严重程度。
回顾性纳入2017年1月至2021年7月期间发生髌骨脱位的患者。纳入有髌骨脱位记录且患侧膝关节进行过MRI扫描的患者。排除脱位事件发生前就存在关节软骨损伤的患者。采用经过验证的系统AMADEUS(平均总面积测量及深度与深层结构)对关节软骨损伤进行分级。还收集了Caton-Deschamps指数(CDI)评分和滑车发育不良的Dejour分类。通过进行检验、Mann-Whitney检验以及χ²检验或Fisher精确检验来计算分类数据的值。
总共纳入233例患者:117例首次脱位患者和116例复发性脱位患者。51例首次脱位患者(43.6%)和68例复发性脱位患者(58.6%,P = 0.026)存在关节软骨损伤。比较两组时,复发性脱位组女性患者比例显著更高(65.5%对46.2%,P = 0.004)。两组之间在损伤大小、软骨下骨缺损、骨水肿的存在情况或AMADEUS总分方面无差异(P = 0.231)。两组之间比较时,Caton-Deschamps指数评分无显著性差异;然而,Dejour分类显示复发性脱位组分级更高(A-D分级量表P = 0.013,高/低分级量表P = 0.005)。亚组分析显示,当存在软骨损伤时,首次脱位组患者全层损伤明显更多(P < 0.001)且AMADEUS评分更低(P = 0.016)。
首次髌骨脱位和复发性髌骨脱位后MRI显示软骨损伤的患病率同样高。软骨损伤在首次脱位组和复发性脱位组中主要累及髌骨内外侧关节面和股骨外侧髁。然而,首次脱位组全层损伤数量增加。首次脱位组和复发性脱位组在损伤大小、软骨下骨缺损、骨水肿的存在情况或AMADEUS总分方面无差异。
III级,回顾性比较预后研究。