van der Burg Nicole M D, Ekelund Carl, Bjermer Leif H, Aronsson David, Ankerst Jaro, Tufvesson Ellen
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Palliative Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Jan 19;17:21-32. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S442217. eCollection 2024.
Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) in asthma involves both the central and peripheral airways but is primarily relieved with beta-2-agonists and evaluated by spirometry. To date, antimuscarinics can be added as a reliever medication in more severe asthma. We hypothesize that combining both short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) and short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA) could also improve the responsiveness in mild-moderate asthma. Therefore, we aimed to compare the direct effects of inhaling SABA alone, SAMA alone or combining both SABA and SAMA on the central and peripheral airways in asthma.
Twenty-three patients with mild-moderate BDR in asthma performed dynamic spirometry and impulse oscillometry before (baseline) and multiple timepoints within an hour after inhalation of SABA (salbutamol), SAMA (ipratropium bromide), or both SABA and SAMA at three different visits.
The use of SAMA alone did not show any improvement compared to the use of SABA alone. Inhalation of SABA+SAMA, however, averaged either similar or better BDR than SABA alone in FEV, MMEF, FVC, R5, R20 and R5-R20. Inhaling SABA+SAMA reached a stable BDR in more patients within 0-10 minutes and also reached the FEV (Δ%)>12% faster (3.5 minutes) than inhaling SABA alone (5.1 minutes). Inhaling SABA+SAMA was significantly better than SAMA alone in FEV ( = 0.015), MMEF ( = 0.0059) and R20 ( = 0.0049). Using these three variables highlighted a subgroup (30%, including more males) of patients that were more responsive to inhaling SABA+SAMA than SABA alone.
Overall, combining SAMA with SABA was faster and more consistent at increasing the lung function than SABA alone or SAMA alone, and the additive effect was best captured by incorporating peripheral-related variables. Therefore, SAMA should be considered as an add-on reliever for mild-moderate patients with BDR in asthma.
哮喘中的支气管扩张剂反应性(BDR)涉及中央气道和外周气道,但主要通过β-2激动剂缓解,并通过肺量计进行评估。迄今为止,抗毒蕈碱药物可作为更严重哮喘的缓解药物添加使用。我们假设联合使用短效β-2激动剂(SABA)和短效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(SAMA)也可改善轻中度哮喘的反应性。因此,我们旨在比较单独吸入SABA、单独吸入SAMA或联合吸入SABA和SAMA对哮喘中央气道和外周气道的直接影响。
23例轻中度BDR的哮喘患者在三次不同就诊时,于吸入SABA(沙丁胺醇)、SAMA(异丙托溴铵)或SABA与SAMA联合用药前(基线)及用药后1小时内的多个时间点进行动态肺量计和脉冲振荡法测定。
单独使用SAMA与单独使用SABA相比未显示出任何改善。然而,吸入SABA+SAMA在第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV)、最大呼气中期流速(MMEF)、用力肺活量(FVC)、气道阻力(R5)、共振频率(R20)和R5-R20方面的BDR平均与单独使用SABA相似或更好。吸入SABA+SAMA在0至10分钟内使更多患者达到稳定的BDR,并且比单独吸入SABA更快(3.5分钟)达到FEV(变化率)>12%(单独吸入SABA为5.1分钟)。在FEV(P = 0.015)、MMEF(P = 0.0059)和R20(P = 0.0049)方面,吸入SABA+SAMA明显优于单独使用SAMA。使用这三个变量突出显示了一组(30%,包括更多男性)对吸入SABA+SAMA比单独吸入SABA反应更敏感的患者。
总体而言,与单独使用SABA或单独使用SAMA相比,联合使用SAMA和SABA在增加肺功能方面更快且更一致,并且通过纳入外周相关变量能最好地体现其相加效应。因此,SAMA应被视为轻中度BDR哮喘患者的附加缓解药物。