Janssen Research and Development, Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP), Brussels, Belgium.
Infection. 2024 Jun;52(3):1073-1085. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02163-z. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
Clinical data characterizing invasive Escherichia coli disease (IED) are limited. We assessed the clinical presentation of IED and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns of causative E. coli isolates in older adults.
EXPECT-2 (NCT04117113) was a prospective, observational, multinational, hospital-based study conducted in patients with IED aged ≥ 60 years. IED was determined by the microbiological confirmation of E. coli from blood; or by the microbiological confirmation of E. coli from urine or an otherwise sterile body site in the presence of requisite criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), or quick SOFA (qSOFA). The primary outcomes were the clinical presentation of IED and AMR rates of E. coli isolates to clinically relevant antibiotics. Complications and in-hospital mortality were assessed through 28 days following IED diagnosis.
Of 240 enrolled patients, 80.4% had bacteremic and 19.6% had non-bacteremic IED. One-half of infections (50.4%) were community-acquired. The most common source of infection was the urinary tract (62.9%). Of 240 patients, 65.8% fulfilled ≥ 2 SIRS criteria, and 60.4% had a total SOFA score of ≥ 2. Investigator-diagnosed sepsis and septic shock were reported in 72.1% and 10.0% of patients, respectively. The most common complication was kidney dysfunction (12.9%). The overall in-hospital mortality was 4.6%. Of 299 E. coli isolates tested, the resistance rates were: 30.4% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 24.1% for ciprofloxacin, 22.1% for levofloxacin, 16.4% for ceftriaxone, 5.7% for cefepime, and 4.3% for ceftazidime.
The clinical profile of identified IED cases was characterized by high rates of sepsis. IED was associated with high rates of AMR to clinically relevant antibiotics. The identification of IED can be optimized by using a combination of clinical criteria (SIRS, SOFA, or qSOFA) and culture results.
目前关于侵袭性大肠埃希菌病(Escherichia coli disease,IED)的临床数据十分有限。本研究旨在评估老年患者侵袭性大肠埃希菌病的临床特征和引起感染的大肠埃希菌的抗生素耐药模式。
EXPECT-2 是一项前瞻性、观察性、多国、基于医院的研究,纳入年龄≥60 岁的侵袭性大肠埃希菌病患者。通过血培养大肠埃希菌阳性、或尿培养或其他无菌部位培养大肠埃希菌阳性且伴有全身炎症反应综合征(systemic inflammatory response syndrome,SIRS)、序贯器官衰竭评估(Sequential Organ Failure Assessment,SOFA)或快速 SOFA(quick SOFA,qSOFA)评分标准的患者,确定为侵袭性大肠埃希菌病。主要结局是侵袭性大肠埃希菌病的临床特征和大肠埃希菌对临床相关抗生素的耐药率。通过感染后 28 天评估并发症和院内死亡率。
共纳入 240 例患者,80.4%为菌血症性 IED,19.6%为非菌血症性 IED。50.4%的感染为社区获得性感染。最常见的感染源为泌尿道(62.9%)。65.8%的患者符合≥2 项 SIRS 标准,60.4%的患者 SOFA 总评分≥2 分。研究者诊断的脓毒症和感染性休克分别占 72.1%和 10.0%。最常见的并发症是肾功能障碍(12.9%)。总的院内死亡率为 4.6%。共检测了 299 株大肠埃希菌,其耐药率分别为:复方磺胺甲噁唑 30.4%、环丙沙星 24.1%、左氧氟沙星 22.1%、头孢曲松 16.4%、头孢吡肟 5.7%和头孢他啶 4.3%。
本研究中侵袭性大肠埃希菌病的临床特征表现为高比例的脓毒症。该疾病与临床相关抗生素的耐药率高有关。通过将临床标准(SIRS、SOFA 或 qSOFA)与培养结果相结合,可以优化侵袭性大肠埃希菌病的诊断。