Department of VIP Medical, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2024 Mar;15(7):550-558. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15221. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
A new concept of HER2-low has emerged in recent years. However, the prognostic value and the relapse pattern of HER2-low is unclear.
Our study included patients diagnosed with HER2-negative/hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to explore the differences in survival outcomes between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group. More importantly, we explored different recurrence patterns, including the comparison of metastatic sites and recurrence time curve between the two groups.
A total of 797 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were analyzed. Similar disease-free survival (DFS) was observed between the HER2-low group and HER2-zero group (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61-1.16, p = 0.290). There was also no significant difference in OS between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group (HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.46-1.28, p = 0.310). When IHC 1+ and 0 were taken as a group, the IHC 2+ group had significantly better DFS than the IHC 1+ and 0 group in some subgroups. The risk of bone metastasis in patients with HER2 IHC 1+ and 0 was significantly higher than that of patients with HER2 IHC 2+ (12.7% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001). Compared with the HER2-zero group, we found that the HER2-low group had a more obvious peak in mortality at the time of postoperative 80th-100th month.
No significant difference in DFS and OS between the HER2-low group and the HER2-zero group was observed. Patients with HER2 IHC 1+ and 0 tend to develop bone metastasis. The HER2-low group had a more obvious second peak in mortality.
近年来出现了一种新的 HER2-低概念。然而,HER2-低的预后价值和复发模式尚不清楚。
我们的研究纳入了诊断为 HER2 阴性/激素受体阳性乳腺癌的患者,以探讨 HER2-低组和 HER2-零组之间生存结局的差异。更重要的是,我们探讨了不同的复发模式,包括两组之间转移部位的比较和复发时间曲线。
共分析了 797 例激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者。HER2-低组和 HER2-零组的无病生存(DFS)相似(HR 0.84,95%CI:0.61-1.16,p=0.290)。HER2-低组和 HER2-零组的总生存(OS)也无显著差异(HR 0.77,95%CI:0.46-1.28,p=0.310)。当 IHC 1+和 0 被视为一组时,IHC 2+组在某些亚组中的 DFS 明显优于 IHC 1+和 0 组。HER2 IHC 1+和 0 患者的骨转移风险明显高于 HER2 IHC 2+患者(12.7%比 4.7%,p<0.001)。与 HER2-零组相比,我们发现 HER2-低组在术后 80-100 个月时死亡率出现更明显的高峰。
HER2-低组和 HER2-零组之间的 DFS 和 OS 无显著差异。HER2 IHC 1+和 0 患者易发生骨转移。HER2-低组死亡率出现更明显的二次高峰。