Private Clinic, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin University, Çiftlikköy Campus, Yenişehir, Mersin, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 28;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03890-x.
A shear bond strength between the biomaterial and restorative material is crucial for minimizing bacterial microleakage and ensuring a favorable long-term prognosis for vital pulp therapy. This study aimed to conduct a comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength between calcium silicate-based biomaterials utilized in vital pulp treatment and various glass ionomer cement materials, both with and without the application of adhesive agents.
A total of 270 acrylic blocks, each featuring cavities measuring 4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth, were prepared. Calcium silicate-containing biomaterials (ProRoot MTA, Medcem Pure Portland Cement, and Medcem MTA), following manufacturers' instructions, were placed within the voids in the acrylic blocks and allowed to set for the recommended durations. The biomaterial samples were randomly categorized into three groups based on the restorative material to be applied: conventional glass ionomer cement, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and bioactive restorative material. Using cylindrical molds with a diameter of 3.2 mm and a height of 3 mm, restorative materials were applied to the biomaterials in two different methods, contingent on whether adhesive was administered. After all samples were incubated in an oven at 37 °C for 24 h, shear bond strength values were measured utilizing a universal testing device. The obtained data were statistically evaluated using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests.
The highest shear bond strength value was noted in the Medcem MTA + ACTIVA bioactive restorative material group with adhesive application, while the lowest shear bond strength value was observed in the ProRoot MTA White + Equia Forte HT Fil group without adhesive application (P < 0.05).
Activa Bioactive Restorative may be considered a suitable restorative material in combination with calcium silicate-based biomaterials for vital pulp treatment. The application of adhesives to calcium silicate-based biomaterials can effectively address the technical limitations.
生物材料与修复材料之间的抗剪粘结强度对于最大限度地减少细菌微渗漏并确保活髓治疗有良好的长期预后至关重要。本研究旨在比较用于活髓治疗的硅酸钙基生物材料与各种玻璃离子水门汀材料之间的抗剪粘结强度,同时评估在应用和不应用粘结剂的情况下的粘结强度。
共制备 270 个丙烯酸块,每个块均具有直径为 4mm、深度为 2mm 的腔。根据制造商的说明,将含有硅酸钙的生物材料(ProRoot MTA、Medcem Pure Portland Cement 和 Medcem MTA)置于丙烯酸块的空隙中,并允许其按推荐的时间凝固。根据要应用的修复材料,将生物材料样本随机分为三组:传统玻璃离子水门汀、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和生物活性修复材料。使用直径为 3.2mm、高度为 3mm 的圆柱形模具,根据是否应用粘结剂,以两种不同的方法将修复材料应用于生物材料。所有样本均在 37°C 的烘箱中孵育 24 小时后,使用万能测试设备测量抗剪粘结强度值。使用 ANOVA 和事后 Tukey 检验对获得的数据进行统计学评估。
在应用粘结剂的情况下,Medcem MTA+ACTIVA 生物活性修复材料组的抗剪粘结强度值最高,而在未应用粘结剂的情况下,ProRoot MTA White+Equia Forte HT Fil 组的抗剪粘结强度值最低(P<0.05)。
在活髓治疗中,可将 Activa Bioactive Restorative 视为与硅酸钙基生物材料结合使用的合适修复材料。在硅酸钙基生物材料上应用粘结剂可以有效地解决技术限制。