Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics and Physiology Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0291744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291744. eCollection 2024.
When wild honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) nest in hollow tree cavities, they coat the rough cavity walls with a continuous layer of propolis, a substance comprised primarily of plant resins. Studies have shown that the resulting "propolis envelope" leads to both individual- and colony-level health benefits. Unfortunately, the smooth wooden boxes most commonly used in beekeeping do little to stimulate propolis collection. As a result, most managed bees live in hives that are propolis-poor. In this study, we assessed different surface texture treatments (rough wood boxes, boxes outfitted with propolis traps, and standard, smooth wood boxes) in terms of their ability to stimulate propolis collection, and we examined the effect of propolis on colony health, pathogen loads, immune gene expression, bacterial gene expression, survivorship, and honey production in both stationary and migratory beekeeping contexts. We found that rough wood boxes are the most effective box type for stimulating propolis deposition. Although the use of rough wood boxes did not improve colony survivorship overall, Melissococcus plutonius detections via gene expression were significantly lower in rough wood boxes, and viral loads for multiple viruses tended to decrease as propolis deposition increased. By the end of year one, honey bee populations in migratory rough box colonies were also significantly larger than those in migratory control colonies. The use of rough wood boxes did correspond with decreased honey production in year one migratory colonies but had no effect during year two. Finally, in both stationary and migratory operations, propolis deposition was correlated with a seasonal decrease and/or stabilization in the expression of multiple immune and bacterial genes, suggesting that propolis-rich environments contribute to hive homeostasis. These findings provide support for the practical implementation of rough box hives as a means to enhance propolis collection and colony health in multiple beekeeping contexts.
当野生蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)在树洞中空处筑巢时,它们会用一层连续的蜂胶覆盖粗糙的腔壁,蜂胶主要由植物树脂组成。研究表明,由此产生的“蜂胶包膜”对个体和群体的健康都有好处。不幸的是,养蜂中最常用的光滑木盒对刺激蜂胶采集几乎没有作用。因此,大多数管理的蜜蜂生活在缺乏蜂胶的蜂箱中。在这项研究中,我们评估了不同的表面纹理处理(粗糙木盒、装有蜂胶诱捕器的盒子和标准的光滑木盒)对刺激蜂胶采集的能力,并研究了蜂胶对群体健康、病原体负荷、免疫基因表达、细菌基因表达、存活率和蜂蜜产量的影响,包括在固定和迁徙养蜂环境中。我们发现,粗糙木盒是刺激蜂胶沉积的最有效箱型。虽然使用粗糙木盒并没有整体提高蜂群的存活率,但粗糙木盒中 Melissococcus plutonius 的基因表达检测明显较低,随着蜂胶沉积的增加,多种病毒的病毒载量也趋于降低。到第一年年底,迁徙粗糙盒蜂群中的蜜蜂种群也明显大于迁徙对照蜂群。在第一年迁徙的蜂群中,粗糙木盒的使用确实与蜂蜜产量的降低有关,但在第二年没有影响。最后,在固定和迁徙作业中,蜂胶沉积与多个免疫和细菌基因表达的季节性下降和/或稳定有关,这表明富含蜂胶的环境有助于蜂箱的动态平衡。这些发现为在多种养蜂环境中实际实施粗糙盒蜂箱作为增强蜂胶采集和群体健康的方法提供了支持。