Mamchur Aleksandra, Sharashkina Natalia, Erema Veronika, Kashtanova Daria, Ivanov Mikhail, Bruttan Maria, Zelenova Elena, Shelly Eva, Ostapenko Valentina, Dzhumaniiazova Irina, Matkava Lorena, Yudin Vladimir, Akopyan Anna, Strazhesko Irina, Maytesyan Lilit, Tarasova Irina, Beloshevskaya Olga, Keskinov Anton, Kraevoy Sergey, Tkacheva Olga, Yudin Sergey
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks, Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Aging Dis. 2024 Jan 28;16(1):565-77. doi: 10.14336/AD.2024.0120.
Aging is a natural process with varying effects. As we grow older, our bodies become more susceptible to aging-associated diseases. These diseases, individually or collectively, lead to the formation of distinct aging phenotypes. Identifying these aging phenotypes and understanding the complex interplay between coexistent diseases would facilitate more personalized patient management, a better prognosis, and a prolonged lifespan. Many studies distinguish between successful aging and frailty. However, this simple distinction fails to reflect the diversity of underlying causes. In this study, we sought to establish the underlying causes of frailty and determine the patterns in which these causes converge to form aging phenotypes. We conducted a comprehensive geriatric examination, cognitive assessment, and survival analysis of 2,688 long-living adults (median age = 92 years). The obtained data were clustered and used as input data for the Aging Phenotype Calculator, a multiclass classification model validated on an independent dataset of 96 older adults. The accuracy of the model was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve. Additionally, we analyzed socioeconomic factors that could contribute to specific aging patterns. We identified five aging phenotypes: non-frailty, multimorbid frailty, metabolic frailty, cognitive frailty, and functional frailty. For each phenotype, we determined the underlying diseases and conditions and assessed the survival rate. Additionally, we provided management recommendations for each of the five phenotypes based on their distinct features and associated challenges. The identified aging phenotypes may facilitate better-informed decision-making. The Aging Phenotype Calculator (ROC AUC = 92%) may greatly assist geriatricians in patient management.
衰老 是一个具有不同影响的自然过程。随着年龄的增长,我们的身体更容易患上与衰老相关的疾病。这些疾病单独或共同导致形成不同的衰老表型。识别这些衰老表型并了解共存疾病之间复杂的相互作用将有助于更个性化的患者管理、更好的预后和延长寿命。许多研究区分了成功衰老和虚弱。然而,这种简单的区分未能反映潜在原因的多样性。在本研究中,我们试图确定虚弱的潜在原因,并确定这些原因汇聚形成衰老表型的模式。我们对2688名长寿成年人(中位年龄 = 92岁)进行了全面的老年医学检查、认知评估和生存分析。将获得的数据进行聚类,并用作衰老表型计算器的输入数据,该计算器是一个在96名老年人的独立数据集上验证的多类分类模型。使用受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积评估模型的准确性。此外,我们分析了可能导致特定衰老模式的社会经济因素。我们确定了五种衰老表型:非虚弱型、多病虚弱型、代谢虚弱型、认知虚弱型和功能虚弱型。对于每种表型,我们确定了潜在的疾病和状况,并评估了生存率。此外,我们根据五种表型各自的独特特征和相关挑战为其提供了管理建议。所识别的衰老表型可能有助于做出更明智的决策。衰老表型计算器(ROC曲线下面积 = 92%)可能会极大地帮助老年病医生进行患者管理。