Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Memory. 2024 Jul;32(6):738-756. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2307925. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
Experimental studies show that vividness and emotionality of aversive memories decrease after recall with eye movements. We aimed at replicating this finding. Relatedly, consistent with Conway's view that memory retrieval is constructive, we examined changes in the content of the memories. If eye movements render a memory less aversive, it may be avoided less, stimulating recall and increasing the opportunity to infer (contextual) details. Two experiments ( = 97 and = 250) examined whether eye movements affect the number of central and peripheral memory details and characteristics. Female undergraduate students were randomly allocated to either eye movements with recall (EM) or recall only (RO). Before and after the experimental task, participants rated the vividness and emotionality, provided a detailed description and evaluated other memory characteristics. We replicated earlier findings that vividness (both experiments) and emotionality (experiment 2) were reduced more after EM compared to RO. However, conditions did not statistically significantly differ with respect to content details and other memory characteristics. Overall, findings support the idea that eye movements decrease the experience of the memory as vivid and emotional. Results are inconclusive regarding the idea that eye movements alter the number of recalled central and peripheral memory details.
实验研究表明,通过眼球运动回忆会使厌恶记忆的生动性和情感性降低。我们旨在复制这一发现。相关地,与 Conway 的观点一致,即记忆检索是有建设性的,我们检查了记忆内容的变化。如果眼球运动使记忆的厌恶感降低,那么它可能会被更少地回避,从而刺激回忆并增加推断(上下文)细节的机会。两项实验(n=97 和 n=250)检验了眼球运动是否会影响中央和外周记忆细节的数量和特征。女大学生被随机分配到眼球运动回忆(EM)或仅回忆(RO)组。在实验任务前后,参与者对生动性和情感性进行了评分,提供了详细的描述,并评估了其他记忆特征。我们复制了早期的发现,即与 RO 相比,EM 后记忆的生动性(两个实验)和情感性(实验 2)降低得更多。然而,条件在内容细节和其他记忆特征方面并没有统计学上的显著差异。总的来说,这些发现支持了眼球运动降低记忆生动性和情感性体验的观点。关于眼球运动改变回忆的中央和外周记忆细节数量的观点,结果尚无定论。