King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Feb 2;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00891-3.
Regulation can improve professional practice and patient care, but is often weakly implemented and enforced in health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Taking a de-centred and frontline perspective, we examine national regulatory actors' and health professionals' views and experiences of health professional regulation in Kenya and Uganda and discuss how it might be improved in LMICs more generally.
We conducted large-scale research on professional regulation for doctors and nurses (including midwives) in Uganda and Kenya during 2019-2021. We interviewed 29 national regulatory stakeholders and 47 subnational regulatory actors, doctors, and nurses. We then ran a national survey of Kenyan and Ugandan doctors and nurses, which received 3466 responses. We thematically analysed qualitative data, conducted an exploratory factor analysis of survey data, and validated findings in four focus group discussions.
Kenyan and Ugandan regulators were generally perceived as resource-constrained, remote, and out of touch with health professionals. This resulted in weak regulation that did little to prevent malpractice and inadequate professional education and training. However, interviewees were positive about online licencing and regulation where they had relationships with accessible regulators. Building on these positive findings, we propose an ambidextrous approach to improving regulation in LMIC health systems, which we term deconcentrating regulation. This involves developing online licencing and streamlining regulatory administration to make efficiency savings, freeing regulatory resources. These resources should then be used to develop connected subnational regulatory offices, enhance relations between regulators and health professionals, and address problems at local level.
Professional regulation for doctors and nurses in Kenya and Uganda is generally perceived as weak. Yet these professionals are more positive about online licencing and regulation where they have relationships with regulators. Building on these positive findings, we propose deconcentrating regulation as a solution to regulatory problems in LMICs. However, we note resource, cultural and political barriers to its effective implementation.
监管可以改善专业实践和患者护理,但在中低收入国家(LMICs)的卫生系统中,监管往往执行和实施不力。我们采取去中心化和前线的视角,考察了肯尼亚和乌干达的国家监管行为者和卫生专业人员对卫生专业人员监管的看法和经验,并讨论了如何在更广泛的范围内改善 LMICs 的监管。
我们在 2019-2021 年期间对乌干达和肯尼亚的医生和护士(包括助产士)的专业监管进行了大规模研究。我们采访了 29 名国家监管利益相关者和 47 名次国家监管行为者、医生和护士。然后,我们对肯尼亚和乌干达的医生和护士进行了全国性调查,共收到 3466 份回复。我们对定性数据进行了主题分析,对调查数据进行了探索性因素分析,并在四个焦点小组讨论中验证了研究结果。
肯尼亚和乌干达的监管者普遍被认为资源有限、遥不可及,与卫生专业人员脱节。这导致监管不力,几乎无法防止医疗事故和专业教育和培训不足。然而,受访者对在线许可和监管持积极态度,因为他们与可接触的监管者建立了关系。基于这些积极发现,我们提出了一种在 LMIC 卫生系统中改善监管的双重方法,我们称之为分散监管。这包括开发在线许可和简化监管管理,以节省效率,释放监管资源。然后,应将这些资源用于发展有联系的次国家监管办公室,加强监管者与卫生专业人员之间的关系,并解决地方一级的问题。
肯尼亚和乌干达的医生和护士的专业监管普遍被认为较弱。然而,这些专业人员对在线许可和监管更为积极,因为他们与监管者建立了关系。我们基于这些积极发现,提出了分散监管作为解决 LMIC 监管问题的一种解决方案。然而,我们注意到其有效实施面临资源、文化和政治障碍。