Department of Psychology and Psychodynamics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Krems, Krems, Austria.
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 5;11:e46637. doi: 10.2196/46637.
The prevalence of mental illness increased in children, adolescents, and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, while at the same time, access to treatment facilities has been restricted, resulting in a need for the quick implementation of remote or online interventions.
This study aimed to give an overview of randomized controlled studies examining remote or online interventions for mental health in children, adolescents, and young adults and to explore the overall effectiveness of these interventions regarding different symptoms.
A systematic literature search was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines using PubMed, PsycInfo, Psyndex, Embase, and Google Scholar. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model to calculate overall effect sizes for interventions using standardized mean differences (SMDs) for postintervention scores.
We identified 17 articles with 8732 participants in the final sample, and 13 were included in the quantitative analysis. The studies examined different digital interventions for several outcomes, showing better outcomes than the control in some studies. Meta-analyses revealed significant medium overall effects for anxiety (SMD=0.44, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.67) and social functioning (SMD=0.42, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.17) and a large significant effect for depression (SMD=1.31, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.95). In contrast, no significant overall treatment effects for well-being, psychological distress, disordered eating, and COVID-19-related symptoms were found.
The qualitative and quantitative analyses of the included studies show promising results regarding the effectiveness of online interventions, especially for symptoms of anxiety and depression and for training of social functioning. However, the effectiveness needs to be further investigated for other groups of symptoms in the future. All in all, more research with high-quality studies is required.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,儿童、青少年和年轻人的精神疾病患病率有所增加,而与此同时,获得治疗设施的机会受到限制,因此需要快速实施远程或在线干预措施。
本研究旨在概述针对儿童、青少年和年轻人心理健康的远程或在线干预措施的随机对照研究,并探讨这些干预措施在不同症状方面的总体效果。
根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,使用 PubMed、PsycInfo、Psyndex、Embase 和 Google Scholar 进行系统文献检索。使用随机效应模型对干预措施进行元分析,使用标准化均数差(SMD)计算干预措施的后测得分的总体效果大小。
我们最终确定了 17 篇文章,其中 8732 名参与者纳入最终样本,13 篇文章纳入定量分析。这些研究针对不同的数字干预措施进行了多项研究,显示出在某些研究中比对照组有更好的效果。元分析显示,焦虑症的总体效果有显著的中等效应(SMD=0.44,95%CI 0.20 至 0.67)和社会功能的显著中等效应(SMD=0.42,95%CI-0.68 至-0.17),抑郁症的总体效果有显著的大效应(SMD=1.31,95%CI 0.34 至 2.95)。相比之下,幸福感、心理困扰、饮食失调和 COVID-19 相关症状的总体治疗效果没有显著差异。
纳入研究的定性和定量分析显示,在线干预措施在有效性方面有可喜的结果,特别是在焦虑和抑郁症状以及社会功能训练方面。然而,未来需要进一步研究其他症状组的有效性。总之,需要更多高质量研究的支持。