Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science- Public Health, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Chair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Feb 5;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01562-1.
Interest in applying a complex systems approach to understanding socioeconomic inequalities in health is growing, but an overview of existing research on this topic is lacking. In this systematic scoping review, we summarize the current state of the literature, identify shared drivers of multiple health and health behavior outcomes, and highlight areas ripe for future research.
SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed databases were searched in April 2023 for peer-reviewed, English-language studies in high-income OECD countries containing a conceptual systems model or simulation model of socioeconomic inequalities in health or health behavior in the adult general population. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full texts. Data on study aim, type of model, all model elements, and all relationships were extracted. Model elements were categorized based on the Commission on Social Determinants of Health framework, and relationships between grouped elements were visualized in a summary conceptual systems map.
A total of 42 publications were included; 18 only contained a simulation model, 20 only contained a conceptual model, and 4 contained both types of models. General health outcomes (e.g., health status, well-being) were modeled more often than specific outcomes like obesity. Dietary behavior and physical activity were by far the most commonly modeled health behaviors. Intermediary determinants of health (e.g., material circumstances, social cohesion) were included in nearly all models, whereas structural determinants (e.g., policies, societal values) were included in about a third of models. Using the summary conceptual systems map, we identified 15 shared drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in multiple health and health behavior outcomes.
The interconnectedness of socioeconomic position, multiple health and health behavior outcomes, and determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in health is clear from this review. Factors central to the complex system as it is currently understood in the literature (e.g., financial strain) may be both efficient and effective policy levers, and factors less well represented in the literature (e.g., sleep, structural determinants) may warrant more research. Our systematic, comprehensive synthesis of the literature may serve as a basis for, among other things, a complex systems framework for socioeconomic inequalities in health.
人们越来越感兴趣地将复杂系统方法应用于理解健康方面的社会经济不平等问题,但缺乏对这一主题现有研究的概述。在本次系统范围的综述中,我们总结了现有文献的状况,确定了多种健康和健康行为结果的共同驱动因素,并强调了未来研究的成熟领域。
2023 年 4 月,我们在 SCOPUS、Web of Science 和 PubMed 数据库中搜索了经同行评审的、以英语发表的、来自高收入经合组织国家的研究,这些研究包含了成人普通人群中健康或健康行为的社会经济不平等的概念系统模型或仿真模型。两位独立的审查员筛选了摘要和全文。提取了研究目的、模型类型、所有模型要素和所有关系的数据。根据卫生系统委员会的框架对模型要素进行分类,并在一个总结性概念系统图中显示分组要素之间的关系。
共纳入 42 篇出版物;其中 18 篇仅包含仿真模型,20 篇仅包含概念模型,4 篇同时包含这两种类型的模型。一般健康结果(如健康状况、幸福感)比肥胖等特定结果更常被建模。饮食行为和身体活动是迄今为止最常被建模的健康行为。健康的中间决定因素(如物质条件、社会凝聚力)几乎包含在所有模型中,而结构决定因素(如政策、社会价值观)则包含在约三分之一的模型中。使用总结性概念系统图,我们确定了 15 个共同驱动因素,这些因素可导致多种健康和健康行为结果的社会经济不平等。
从本次综述可以清楚地看出,社会经济地位、多种健康和健康行为结果以及健康方面社会经济不平等的决定因素之间的相互关联。文献中当前理解的复杂系统的核心因素(如经济压力)可能既是有效的也是有效的政策杠杆,而文献中代表性不足的因素(如睡眠、结构决定因素)可能需要更多的研究。我们对文献的系统、全面综合可以为健康方面的社会经济不平等的复杂系统框架等提供基础。