Laberge Maude, Brundisini Francesca, Daniel Imtiaz, Espinoza Moya Maria Eugenia
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, 1050 av de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, HÔpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050, Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada.
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 23;10(3):e24904. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24904. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
There is wide agreement on the benefits of integrated care; yet funding barriers persist. We suggest that funding models could currently hinder quality of care and that identifying values is necessary to designing adequate funding models. Yet it is currently unclear what are these values that ought to shape healthcare policy decisions. To fill in this gap, we conducted semi-structure interviews with fourteen health policy officials, managers, and researchers to elicit and explore how they conceptualize the values and guiding principles underlying these funding policies. Our findings suggest that values guide population-based integrated funding models, namely: accountability & integrity, transparency, equity, and innovation. Overall, funding mechanisms could incentivize integrated population-based care when the following conditions are met: a) there is transparent governance, with a whole-system approach, political will, and engagement and collaboration across health system partners, organizations and institutions, b) regulatory and evaluative frameworks support accountability including in decision-making, in outcomes and quality of care, as well as financial accountability; c) funding is equitable with a fair distribution of resources and supports accessibility to services; and d) funding mechanisms design and implementation include innovation enabling change, which are continuously evaluated. These values and guiding principles could be used in the development of funding models and future studies need to evaluate the effect of these values on decisions made by policy makers with respect to funding allocations and investments.
对于整合式照护的益处已达成广泛共识;然而资金障碍依然存在。我们认为,当前的资金模式可能会阻碍照护质量,并且确定价值观对于设计适当的资金模式是必要的。然而,目前尚不清楚哪些价值观应该塑造医疗保健政策决策。为了填补这一空白,我们对14位卫生政策官员、管理人员和研究人员进行了半结构化访谈,以引出并探讨他们如何构想这些资金政策背后的价值观和指导原则。我们的研究结果表明,价值观指导着基于人群的整合式资金模式,即:问责制与诚信、透明度、公平性和创新性。总体而言,当满足以下条件时,资金机制可以激励基于人群的整合式照护:a) 有透明的治理,采用全系统方法,有政治意愿,以及卫生系统合作伙伴、组织和机构之间的参与和协作;b) 监管和评估框架支持问责制,包括在决策、照护结果和质量以及财务问责方面;c) 资金公平,资源分配合理,并支持服务的可及性;d) 资金机制的设计和实施包括能够推动变革的创新,并不断进行评估。这些价值观和指导原则可用于资金模式的制定,未来的研究需要评估这些价值观对政策制定者在资金分配和投资决策方面的影响。