Suppr超能文献

特瑞利木单抗联合度伐利尤单抗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌。

Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York.

出版信息

NEJM Evid. 2022 Aug;1(8):EVIDoa2100070. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100070. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A single, high priming dose of tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated antigen 4) plus durvalumab (anti–programmed cell death ligand-1), an infusion regimen termed STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab), showed encouraging clinical activity and safety in a phase 2 trial of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In this global, open-label, phase 3 trial, the majority of the patients we enrolled with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and no previous systemic treatment were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: tremelimumab (300 mg, one dose) plus durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks; STRIDE), durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks), or sorafenib (400 mg twice daily). The primary objective was overall survival for STRIDE versus sorafenib. Noninferiority for overall survival for durvalumab versus sorafenib was a secondary objective. RESULTS: In total, 1171 patients were randomly assigned to STRIDE (n=393), durvalumab (n=389), or sorafenib (n=389). The median overall survival was 16.43 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.16 to 19.58) with STRIDE, 16.56 months (95% CI, 14.06 to 19.12) with durvalumab, and 13.77 months (95% CI, 12.25 to 16.13) with sorafenib. Overall survival at 36 months was 30.7%, 24.7%, and 20.2%, respectively. The overall survival hazard ratio for STRIDE versus sorafenib was 0.78 (96.02% CI, 0.65 to 0.93; P=0.0035). Overall survival with durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95.67% CI, 0.73 to 1.03; noninferiority margin, 1.08). Median progression-free survival was not significantly different among all three groups. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred for 50.5% of patients with STRIDE, 37.1% with durvalumab, and 52.4% with sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: STRIDE significantly improved overall survival versus sorafenib. Durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03298451.)

摘要

背景

在一项不可切除肝细胞癌的 2 期临床试验中,单次高剂量 Tremelimumab(抗细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关抗原 4)联合 durvalumab(抗程序性死亡配体 1)的输注方案 STRIDE(单次 Tremelimumab 规律间隔 durvalumab)显示出令人鼓舞的临床活性和安全性。

方法

在这项全球性、开放性、3 期临床试验中,我们招募的大多数不可切除肝细胞癌且无既往系统治疗的患者被随机分配接受以下三种方案之一:Tremelimumab(300mg,一剂)联合 durvalumab(1500mg 每 4 周;STRIDE)、durvalumab(1500mg 每 4 周)或索拉非尼(400mg,每日 2 次)。主要终点是 STRIDE 与索拉非尼的总生存期。durvalumab 与索拉非尼的总生存期非劣效性是次要终点。

结果

共有 1171 名患者被随机分配至 STRIDE(n=393)、durvalumab(n=389)或 sorafenib(n=389)组。STRIDE 的中位总生存期为 16.43 个月(95%置信区间[CI],14.16 至 19.58),durvalumab 为 16.56 个月(95%CI,14.06 至 19.12),索拉非尼为 13.77 个月(95%CI,12.25 至 16.13)。36 个月时的总生存率分别为 30.7%、24.7%和 20.2%。STRIDE 与索拉非尼的总生存期风险比为 0.78(96.02%CI,0.65 至 0.93;P=0.0035)。durvalumab 单药治疗的总生存期非劣效于索拉非尼(风险比,0.86;95.67%CI,0.73 至 1.03;非劣效性边界,1.08)。三组患者的中位无进展生存期无显著差异。STRIDE 组有 50.5%的患者发生 3/4 级治疗相关不良事件,durvalumab 组为 37.1%,索拉非尼组为 52.4%。

结论

STRIDE 显著改善了总生存期,与索拉非尼相比。durvalumab 单药治疗与索拉非尼相比,不可切除肝细胞癌患者非劣效。(由阿斯利康资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT03298451)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验