Author Affiliations: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids and East Lansing, Michigan (Drs Yu, Meghea, and Roman and Mss Raffo and Meng); and Corewell Health, Healthier Communities Department, Strong Beginnings, Grand Rapids, Michigan (Mss Vander Meulen and Lloyd).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(3):E124-E134. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001861. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
Racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal health remain a public health crisis. Despite improved outcomes from home visiting (HV) participation during pregnancy, most eligible individuals of color do not engage. Neighborhood segregation, a manifestation of structural racism, may impose constraints on engaging eligible individuals in HV.
To examine whether race, ethnicity, and/or language-concordant community health workers (CHWs) increased HV engagement for birthing people in segregated neighborhoods.
Program evaluation using administrative linked data from birth records, Medicaid claims, and HV program participation. Strong Beginnings (SB), a program with HV provided by CHWs working with nurses and social workers, was compared with the Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP), a state Medicaid-sponsored HV program without CHW involvement. Data were analyzed using χ 2 tests and Poisson regressions.
A total of 4560 individuals with a Medicaid-eligible birth between 2016 and 2019, including 1172 from SB and 3388 from the MIHP.
Penetration (percentage of participants in HV among all Medicaid-eligible individuals across quintiles of neighborhood segregation) and dosage (the total number of home visits from both CHWs and nurses/social workers, and then restricted to those from nurses/social workers).
SB penetrated more segregated neighborhoods than the MIHP (58.4% vs 48.3%; P < .001). SB participants received a higher dosage of home visits (mean [SD]: 11.9 [6.1]) than MIHP participants (mean [SD]: 4.4 [2.8], P < .001). Importantly, CHWs did not replace but moderately increased home visits from nurses and social workers (51.1% vs 35.2% with ≥5 intervention visits, P < .001), especially in more segregated neighborhoods.
Community-informed HV models intentionally designed for people facing disparities may help facilitate program outreach to segregated neighborhoods with concentrated deprivation and reduce racial and ethnic disparities.
An HV program provided by CHWs working with nurses and social workers was associated with an increase in penetration and dosage in segregated neighborhoods, compared with HV without CHW involvement. This underscores the value of CHWs partnering with licensed professional workers in improving HV engagement in disadvantaged communities.
围产期健康方面的种族和民族差异仍然是一个公共卫生危机。尽管在家访(HV)参与方面的结果有所改善,但大多数符合条件的有色人种个体并没有参与。邻里隔离是结构性种族主义的一种表现形式,可能会限制符合条件的个体参与 HV。
研究在隔离的社区中,种族、民族和/或语言一致的社区卫生工作者(CHW)是否会增加 HV 参与度。
使用出生记录、医疗补助(Medicaid)索赔和 HV 项目参与的行政关联数据进行项目评估。Strong Beginnings(SB)是一个由 CHW 与护士和社会工作者合作提供 HV 的项目,与 Maternal Infant Health Program(MIHP)进行比较,后者是一个由州医疗补助计划资助的 HV 项目,没有 CHW 参与。使用 χ 2 检验和泊松回归分析数据。
共有 4560 名 Medicaid 合格分娩的个体,包括 SB 中的 1172 名和 MIHP 中的 3388 名。
渗透(HV 参与者在所有 Medicaid 合格个体中的比例,按邻里隔离度五分位数划分)和剂量(来自 CHW 和护士/社会工作者的家访总数,然后限制为仅来自护士/社会工作者的家访)。
SB 在隔离程度较高的社区的渗透度高于 MIHP(58.4% vs 48.3%;P <.001)。SB 参与者接受的家访剂量较高(平均值[标准差]:11.9[6.1])高于 MIHP 参与者(平均值[标准差]:4.4[2.8],P <.001)。重要的是,CHW 没有取代而是适度增加了护士和社会工作者的家访次数(与≥5 次干预性家访相比,51.1% vs 35.2%,P <.001),尤其是在隔离程度较高的社区。
为面临差异的人群量身定制的社区知情 HV 模式可能有助于促进针对贫困和资源匮乏社区的项目拓展,并减少种族和民族差异。
与没有 CHW 参与的 HV 项目相比,由 CHW 与护士和社会工作者合作提供的 HV 项目与隔离社区的渗透度和剂量增加有关。这强调了 CHW 与持照专业人员合作,在弱势社区改善 HV 参与度的价值。