Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J Neurooncol. 2024 Feb;166(3):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04586-6. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
Brain tumours are associated with neurocognitive impairments that are important for safe driving. Driving is vital to maintaining patient autonomy, despite this there is limited research on driving capacity amongst patients with brain tumours. The purpose of this review is to examine MVC risk in patients with brain tumours to inform development of clearer driving guidelines.
A systematic review was performed using Medline and EMBASE. Observational studies were included. The outcome of interest was MVC or measured risk of MVC in patients with benign or malignant brain tumours. Descriptive analysis and synthesis without meta-analysis were used to summarise findings. A narrative review of driving guidelines from Australia, United Kingdom and Canada was completed.
Three studies were included in this review. One cohort study, one cross-sectional study and one case-control study were included (19,135 participants) across United States and Finland. One study evaluated the incidence of MVC in brain tumour patients, revealing no difference in MVC rates. Two studies measured MVC risk using driving simulation and cognitive testing. Patients found at higher risk of MVC had greater degrees of memory and visual attention impairments. However, predictive patient and tumour characteristics of MVC risk were heterogeneous across studies. Overall, driving guidelines had clear recommendations on selected conditions like seizures but were vague surrounding neurocognitive deficits.
Limited data exists regarding driving behaviour and MVC incidence in brain tumour patients. Existing guidelines inadequately address neurocognitive complexities in this group. Future studies evaluating real-world data is required to inform development of more applicable driving guidelines.
PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023434608.
脑肿瘤与神经认知障碍有关,这些障碍对安全驾驶很重要。尽管如此,由于缺乏对脑肿瘤患者驾驶能力的研究,驾驶对于维持患者的自主性至关重要。本综述的目的是检查脑肿瘤患者的 MVC 风险,以制定更明确的驾驶指南。
使用 Medline 和 EMBASE 进行系统评价。纳入观察性研究。感兴趣的结局是良性或恶性脑肿瘤患者的 MVC 或测量的 MVC 风险。使用描述性分析和综合而不进行荟萃分析来总结发现。对来自澳大利亚、英国和加拿大的驾驶指南进行了叙述性综述。
本综述纳入了三项研究。一项队列研究、一项横断面研究和一项病例对照研究(共 19135 名参与者),分别来自美国和芬兰。一项研究评估了脑肿瘤患者的 MVC 发生率,结果显示 MVC 发生率无差异。两项研究使用驾驶模拟和认知测试来测量 MVC 风险。发现 MVC 风险较高的患者记忆力和视觉注意力损伤程度更大。然而,不同研究中 MVC 风险的患者和肿瘤特征预测因素存在差异。总体而言,针对某些特定条件(如癫痫),驾驶指南有明确的建议,但对神经认知缺陷的规定较为模糊。
目前关于脑肿瘤患者的驾驶行为和 MVC 发生率的数据有限。现有的指南不能充分解决该人群的神经认知复杂性。需要评估现实世界数据的未来研究,为制定更适用的驾驶指南提供信息。
PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023434608。