Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Bioengineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California; California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI), University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Bioengineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California; California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI), University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Mod Pathol. 2024 May;37(5):100444. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100444. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
Surgical pathology workflow involves multiple labor-intensive steps, such as tissue removal, fixation, embedding, sectioning, staining, and microscopic examination. This process is time-consuming and costly and requires skilled technicians. In certain clinical scenarios, such as intraoperative consultations, there is a need for faster histologic evaluation to provide real-time surgical guidance. Currently, frozen section techniques involving hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining are used for intraoperative pathology consultations. However, these techniques have limitations, including a turnaround time of 20 to 30 minutes, staining artifacts, and potential tissue loss, negatively impacting accurate diagnosis. To address these challenges, researchers are exploring alternative optical imaging modalities for rapid microscopic tissue imaging. These modalities differ in optical characteristics, tissue preparation requirements, imaging equipment, and output image quality and format. Some of these imaging methods have been combined with computational algorithms to generate H&E-like images, which could greatly facilitate their adoption by pathologists. Here, we provide a comprehensive, organ-specific review of the latest advancements in emerging imaging modalities applied to nonfixed human tissue. We focused on studies that generated H&E-like images evaluated by pathologists. By presenting up-to-date research progress and clinical utility, this review serves as a valuable resource for scholars and clinicians, covering some of the major technical developments in this rapidly evolving field. It also offers insights into the potential benefits and drawbacks of alternative imaging modalities and their implications for improving patient care.
外科病理学工作流程涉及多个劳动密集型步骤,例如组织切除、固定、包埋、切片、染色和显微镜检查。这个过程既耗时又昂贵,需要熟练的技术人员。在某些临床情况下,例如术中咨询,需要更快的组织学评估以提供实时手术指导。目前,术中病理咨询使用涉及苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色的冷冻切片技术。然而,这些技术存在局限性,包括 20 到 30 分钟的周转时间、染色伪影和潜在的组织损失,这会对准确诊断产生负面影响。为了解决这些挑战,研究人员正在探索用于快速微观组织成像的替代光学成像模式。这些模式在光学特性、组织准备要求、成像设备以及输出图像质量和格式方面存在差异。其中一些成像方法已经与计算算法结合,以生成类似于 H&E 的图像,这将极大地促进病理学家采用这些方法。在这里,我们全面、系统地回顾了新兴成像模式在非固定人体组织中的最新应用进展。我们重点关注那些生成了由病理学家评估的类似于 H&E 的图像的研究。通过呈现最新的研究进展和临床实用性,本综述为学者和临床医生提供了有价值的资源,涵盖了这个快速发展领域的一些主要技术发展。它还提供了对替代成像模式的潜在优势和劣势的见解,以及它们对改善患者护理的影响。