Occupational Medicine Unit, University Hospital of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Infection. 2024 Aug;52(4):1347-1356. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02189-x. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
Anti SARS-CoV-2 vaccination initially showed high effectiveness in preventing COVID-19. However, after the surge of variants of concern, the effectiveness dropped. Several studies investigated if this was related to the decrease of the humoral response over time; however, this issue is still unclear. The aim of this study was to understand whether SARS-CoV-2 anti-S IgG levels can be used to predict breakthrough infection risk and define the timing for further booster doses administration.
Within the framework of the ORCHESTRA Project, over 20,000 health workers from 11 European centers were enrolled since December 2020. We performed two Cox proportional hazards survival analyses regarding pre-Omicron (from January to July 2021) and Omicron (December 2021-May 2022) periods. The serological response was classified as high (above the 75th percentile), medium (25th-75th), or low (< 25th).
Seventy-four (0.33%) and 2122 (20%) health workers were infected during the first and second periods, respectively. Both Cox analyses showed that having high anti-S titer was linked to a significantly lower risk of infection as compared to having medium serological response [HR of high vs medium anti-S titer = 0.27 (95% CI 0.11-0.66) during the first phase, HR = 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.93) during the second phase].
Vaccine effectiveness wanes significantly after new variants surge, making anti-S titer unsuitable to predict optimal timing for further booster dose administration. Studies on other immunological indicators, such as cellular immunity, are therefore needed to better understand the mechanisms and duration of protection against breakthrough infection risk.
抗 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗最初显示出在预防 COVID-19 方面的高有效性。然而,在关注的变异株激增后,其有效性下降。几项研究调查了这是否与随着时间的推移体液反应下降有关;然而,这个问题仍不清楚。本研究旨在了解 SARS-CoV-2 抗-S IgG 水平是否可用于预测突破性感染风险,并确定进一步加强剂量给药的时间。
在 ORCHESTRA 项目的框架内,自 2020 年 12 月以来,来自 11 个欧洲中心的 20000 多名卫生工作者被纳入研究。我们对 Omicron 前(2021 年 1 月至 7 月)和 Omicron 期(2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 5 月)进行了两次 Cox 比例风险生存分析。将血清反应分为高(高于第 75 百分位)、中(第 25-75 百分位)或低(<第 25 百分位)。
在第一和第二阶段,分别有 74 名(0.33%)和 2122 名(20%)卫生工作者感染。两次 Cox 分析均表明,与中血清学反应相比,高抗-S 滴度与感染风险显著降低相关[高 vs 中抗-S 滴度的第一阶段 HR=0.27(95%CI 0.11-0.66),第二阶段 HR=0.76(95%CI 0.62-0.93)]。
新变异株激增后,疫苗有效性显著下降,因此抗-S 滴度不适合预测进一步加强剂量给药的最佳时机。因此,需要对其他免疫指标(如细胞免疫)进行研究,以更好地了解针对突破性感染风险的保护机制和持续时间。