Suppr超能文献

理解治疗性运动处方如何改变对持续性非特异性下腰痛患者重要的结局:一项真实主义综述方案。

Understanding how therapeutic exercise prescription changes outcomes important to patients with persistent non-specific low back pain: a realist review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Keele, Newcastle Under Lyme, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 8;13(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02466-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Persistent low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide, and therapeutic exercise is recommended as a first-line treatment in international guidelines. The effects of exercise on clinical outcomes of pain and physical function are small to moderate, despite broader impacts on cardiovascular systems, biological health, mood, and emotional well-being. Therapeutic exercise prescription is defined as exercise that is prescribed by a clinician for a health-related treatment. It is unknown how therapeutic exercise prescription creates effects on outcomes of importance. Realist reviews explore how underlying mechanisms (M) may be active in the context (C) of certain situations, settings, or populations to create an intended or unintended outcome (O). Our objective is to explore and understand the mechanisms by which therapeutic exercise prescription changes outcomes for people with persistent LBP.

METHODS

We will develop initial programme theories based on preliminary data from a previous systematic review and consensus workshop. These theories will be modified with input from a steering group (experts), a stakeholder group (people with lived experience of exercise for persistent LBP and clinicians), and a scoping search of the published literature. An information specialist will design and undertake an iterative search strategy. These will be used to create CMO configurations, which will be refined and tested using the literature. The realist review will be reported following RAMESES guidance.

DISCUSSION

Realist reviews are uncommon in LBP research to date, yet those offer an opportunity to contrast with traditional methods of randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews and provide additional information regarding the contexts and mechanisms that may trigger certain outcomes. This can aid our understanding of the contextual features that may influence exercise prescription, such as for whom they are most effective, in what setting, how they are implemented and why. This realist synthesis will enhance our understanding of therapeutic exercise prescription to improve adherence and engagement and ultimately will provide clinically relevant recommendations regarding exercise prescription for those with persistent LBP.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017072023).

摘要

介绍

持续性腰痛(LBP)是全球导致残疾的主要原因,国际指南建议将运动治疗作为一线治疗方法。尽管运动对心血管系统、生物健康、情绪和情感健康有更广泛的影响,但它对疼痛和身体功能的临床结果的影响较小。治疗性运动处方是指临床医生为与健康相关的治疗而开的运动。目前尚不清楚治疗性运动处方如何对重要结果产生影响。现实主义评论探讨了潜在机制(M)在特定情况下、环境或人群中如何发挥作用,从而产生预期或非预期的结果(O)。我们的目标是探索和理解治疗性运动处方改变持续性 LBP 患者结局的机制。

方法

我们将根据先前系统评价和共识研讨会的初步数据制定初始方案理论。这些理论将通过指导小组(专家)、利益相关者小组(有运动治疗持续性 LBP 经验的人和临床医生)的意见以及对已发表文献的广泛搜索进行修改。信息专家将设计并进行迭代搜索策略。这些将用于创建 CMO 配置,然后使用文献对其进行细化和测试。该真实审查将按照 RAMESES 指南进行报告。

讨论

到目前为止,真实审查在 LBP 研究中并不常见,但它们提供了一个机会,可以与传统的随机对照试验和系统评价方法形成对比,并提供有关可能引发某些结果的背景和机制的额外信息。这可以帮助我们理解可能影响运动处方的背景特征,例如哪些人最有效、在什么环境下、如何实施以及为什么。这种真实综合分析将增强我们对治疗性运动处方的理解,以提高依从性和参与度,并最终为持续性 LBP 患者的运动处方提供临床相关建议。

系统审查注册

该综述已在 PROSPERO(CRD42017072023)中注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bbe/10854159/1a9f601b39ed/13643_2024_2466_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验