Fliedner Fachhochschule Düsseldorf, University of Applied Science, Alte Landstr. 179, 40489, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 8;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02465-9.
Digitalization in healthcare and society can be challenging, particularly for people who have limited digital experiences. New digital technologies can influence individuals' perceived safety and well-being. In this study, we aimed to identify and analyze the literature on needs and influencing factors in the context of emotional and psychological safety and digitalization in healthcare.
A scoping review was conducted based on the PRISMA-ScR standard. The literature was searched based on the databases Medline via PubMed, PsycINFO via Ovid, and CINAHL via EBSCO. Literature was included after a review of the titles, abstracts, and full texts published in English or German in the last 5 years (October 2017-September 2022). Eligible literature included definitions and descriptions of emotional and/or psychological safety and was related to digitalization in healthcare and was analyzed qualitatively via inductive content analysis. The findings were analyzed from ethical, psychosocial, legal, economic, and political perspectives.
A total of 32 publications were finally included thereof qualitative (n = 20), quantitative (n = 3), and mixed methods (n = 2) studies. Other included publications were systematic integrative reviews, scoping reviews, narrative reviews, white papers, and ethical statements. Of these publications, four qualitative studies focused on emotional or psychological safety in the context of digital technology use in healthcare as a primary research aim. Most literature has shown that perceived safety is influenced by perceived changes in healthcare, digital (health) literacy, the design of digital technology, and need orientation. The needs identified in this context overlap strongly with the influencing factors. A low or high perceived safety has an impact on users' thoughts and actions.
The importance of emotional safety in the context of digital technologies in healthcare is growing, while psychological safety seems to be underrepresented. The interaction between the influencing factors and the need to feel safe leads to considerations that can affect user behavior and have far-reaching outcomes for the implementation of digital technology in healthcare.
Open Science Framework Registries on 16 December 2022 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HVYPT .
医疗保健和社会的数字化可能具有挑战性,特别是对于那些数字体验有限的人。新的数字技术会影响个人的安全感和幸福感。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定并分析医疗保健数字化背景下有关情感和心理安全及相关需求和影响因素的文献。
本研究基于 PRISMA-ScR 标准进行了范围综述。文献检索基于 Medline 通过 PubMed、PsycINFO 通过 Ovid 和 CINAHL 通过 EBSCO 数据库进行。文献纳入标准为:在过去 5 年(2017 年 10 月至 2022 年 9 月)内以英文或德文发表的与情感和/或心理安全相关的定义和描述,以及与医疗保健数字化相关的文献,并通过归纳内容分析进行定性分析。研究结果从伦理、心理社会、法律、经济和政治角度进行了分析。
最终共纳入 32 篇文献,其中包括 20 篇定性研究、3 篇定量研究和 2 篇混合方法研究,其他纳入文献包括系统综述、范围综述、叙事综述、白皮书和伦理声明。这些出版物中,有 4 项定性研究主要关注数字技术在医疗保健中的使用背景下的情感或心理安全。大多数文献表明,感知安全受医疗保健中感知到的变化、数字(健康)素养、数字技术设计和需求导向的影响。在此背景下确定的需求与影响因素高度重叠。感知安全程度低或高会对用户的想法和行为产生影响。
数字技术在医疗保健背景下情感安全的重要性日益增加,而心理安全似乎被低估了。影响因素与安全感需求的相互作用导致了一些需要考虑的因素,这些因素可能会影响用户行为,并对数字技术在医疗保健中的实施产生深远影响。
Open Science Framework Registries 于 2022 年 12 月 16 日注册 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HVYPT。