Suppr超能文献

不同等电聚焦系统治疗性单克隆抗体的荷质比异质性:现状分析。

Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation.

机构信息

National Centre for the Control and Evaluation of Medicines, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

MAbs. 2024 Jan-Dec;16(1):2313737. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

Abstract

Therapeutic mAbs show a specific "charge fingerprint" that may affect safety and efficacy, and, as such, it is often identified as a critical quality attribute (CQA). Capillary iso-electric focusing (cIEF), commonly used for the evaluation of such CQA, provides an analytical tool to investigate mAb purity and identity across the product lifecycle. Here, we discuss the results of an analysis of a panel of antibody products by conventional and whole-column imaging cIEF systems performed as part of European Pharmacopoeia activities related to development of "horizontal standards" for the quality control of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The study aimed at designing and verifying an independent and transversal cIEF procedure for the reliable analysis of mAbs charge variants. Despite the use of comparable experimental conditions, discrepancies in the charge profile and measured isoelectric points emerged between the two cIEF systems. These data suggest that the results are method-dependent rather than absolute, an aspect known to experts in the field and pharmaceutical industry, but not suitably documented in the literature. Critical implications from analytical and regulatory perspectives, are herein thoughtfully discussed, with a special focus on the context of market surveillance and identification of falsified medicines.

摘要

治疗性单抗具有特定的“电荷指纹”,可能会影响安全性和疗效,因此通常被确定为关键质量属性(CQA)。毛细管等电聚焦(cIEF)常用于评估此类 CQA,它提供了一种分析工具,可在产品生命周期内研究单抗的纯度和身份。在这里,我们讨论了在作为欧洲药典开发用于单克隆抗体(mAb)质量控制的“横向标准”相关活动的一部分,使用常规和全柱成像 cIEF 系统对一组抗体产品进行分析的结果。该研究旨在设计和验证一种独立的、横向的 cIEF 程序,用于可靠地分析 mAb 的电荷变体。尽管使用了可比的实验条件,但两种 cIEF 系统之间在电荷分布和测量的等电点方面出现了差异。这些数据表明,结果取决于方法,而不是绝对的,这是该领域的专家和制药行业都知道的,但在文献中没有得到适当的记录。本文从分析和监管的角度,深入讨论了这些关键的影响,特别关注市场监测和假药识别的背景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3442/10860345/97f141b3bb11/KMAB_A_2313737_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验