Vives Dilme Roser, Rivas Juan Gómez, Fernández Hernández Laura, De la Parra Sánchez Irene, Sánchez Del Hoyo Rafael, Galante Romo María Isabel, Redondo González Enrique, Senovilla Pérez José Luis, Fernández Montarroso Lorena, Moreno Sierra Jesús
Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, C/ Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain.
Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Feb 7;16:17562872241229250. doi: 10.1177/17562872241229250. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate.
The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA).
We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score ⩾ 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months.
PSAD showed a significant association with PSM ( < 0.0001), PSA persistence ( < 0.0001), and Gleason ⩾ 7 ( < 0.0001), without being statistically significant in predicting BCR ( = 0.098). The predictive value of PSAD was comparable to pPSA for outcomes of PSA persistence (AUC 0.727 0.771) and Gleason ⩾ 7 (AUC 0.683 0.649).
PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score ⩾ 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.
对诊断为局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的患者进行术前评估对于治疗决策至关重要。目前基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、 Gleason评分和临床分期的分期系统有助于确定这些患者的预后特征。多项研究评估了术前使用前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)作为进一步风险分层的预后因素。迄今为止,PSAD在这种情况下的作用仍是一个有争议的问题。
本分析旨在评估PSAD对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后不良肿瘤学结局的预测潜力,并将其准确性与术前PSA(pPSA)进行比较。
我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2020年1月在单一机构接受RARP的427例诊断为局限性PCa的患者。通过生成受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、计算曲线下面积(AUC)并使用线性回归模型,我们分析了PSAD和pPSA与术后切缘阳性(PSM)、Gleason评分⩾7、PSA持续存在和生化复发(BCR)的相关性,中位随访时间为47个月。
PSAD与PSM(<0.0001)、PSA持续存在(<0.0001)和Gleason⩾7(<0.0001)显著相关,而在预测BCR方面无统计学意义(=0.098)。PSAD对于PSA持续存在(AUC 0.727对AUC 0.771)和Gleason⩾7(AUC 0.683对AUC 0.649)结局的预测价值与pPSA相当。
PSAD是PSM、Gleason评分⩾7和PSA持续存在的术后肿瘤学结局的预测因素。尽管需要进一步研究,但PSAD作为一种预后参数与既定的分期系统联合使用可能是有用的。