Suppr超能文献

胎儿丢失与长期产妇发病率和死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Fetal loss and long-term maternal morbidity and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom.

Women's Health Research Unit, Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2024 Feb 9;21(2):e1004342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004342. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests common pathways between pregnancy losses and subsequent long-term maternal morbidity, rendering pregnancy complications an early chronic disease marker. There is a plethora of studies exploring associations between miscarriage and stillbirth with long-term adverse maternal health; however, these data are inconclusive.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, BNI, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library with relevant keywords and MeSH terms from inception to June 2023 (no language restrictions). We included studies exploring associations between stillbirth or miscarriage and incidence of cardiovascular, malignancy, mental health, other morbidities, and all-cause mortality in women without previous pregnancy loss. Studies reporting short-term morbidity (within a year of loss), case reports, letters, and animal studies were excluded. Study selection and data extraction were performed by 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and publication bias with funnel plots. Subgroup analysis explored the effect of recurrent losses on adverse outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using an inverse variance random effects model and results are reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and prediction intervals (PIs) by combining the most adjusted RR, odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) under the rare outcome assumption. We included 56 observational studies, including 45 in meta-analysis. There were 1,119,815 women who experienced pregnancy loss of whom 951,258 had a miscarriage and 168,557 stillbirth, compared with 11,965,574 women without previous loss. Women with a history of stillbirth had a greater risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) RR 1.56, 95% CI [1.30, 1.88]; p < 0.001, 95% PI [0.49 to 5.15]), cerebrovascular (RR 1.71, 95% CI [1.44, 2.03], p < 0.001, 95% PI [1.92, 2.42]), and any circulatory/cardiovascular disease (RR 1.86, 95% CI [1.01, 3.45], p = 0.05, 95% PI [0.74, 4.10]) compared with women without pregnancy loss. There was no evidence of increased risk of cardiovascular disease (IHD: RR 1.11, 95% CI [0.98, 1.27], 95% PI [0.46, 2.76] or cerebrovascular: RR 1.01, 95% CI [0.85, 1.21]) in women experiencing a miscarriage. Only women with a previous stillbirth were more likely to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (RR: 1.16, 95% CI [1.07 to 2.26]; p < 0.001, 95% PI [1.05, 1.35]). Women with a stillbirth history had an increased risk of developing renal morbidities (RR 1.97, 95% CI [1.51, 2.57], p < 0.001, 95% [1.06, 4.72]) compared with controls. Women with a history of stillbirth had lower risk of breast cancer (RR: 0.80, 95% CI [0.67, 0.96], p-0.02, 95% PI [0.72, 0.93]). There was no evidence of altered risk of other malignancies in women experiencing pregnancy loss compared to controls. There was no evidence of long-term mental illness risk in women with previous pregnancy losses (stillbirth: RR 1.90, 95% CI [0.93, 3.88], 95% PI [0.34, 9.51], miscarriage: RR 1.78, 95% CI [0.88, 3.63], 95% PI [1.13, 4.16]). The main limitations include the potential for confounding due to use of aggregated data with variable degrees of adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that women with a history of stillbirth have a greater risk of future cardiovascular disease, T2DM, and renal morbidities. Women experiencing miscarriages, single or multiple, do not seem to have an altered risk.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,妊娠丢失与随后的长期母体发病率之间存在共同途径,这使得妊娠并发症成为早期慢性疾病的标志物。有大量研究探讨了流产和死胎与长期不良母婴健康之间的关联;然而,这些数据尚无定论。

方法和发现

我们系统地检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、AMED、BNI、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 图书馆,使用相关的关键词和 MeSH 术语,从成立到 2023 年 6 月(无语言限制)。我们纳入了研究流产或死胎与无既往妊娠丢失的妇女心血管疾病、恶性肿瘤、心理健康、其他疾病和全因死亡率发生率之间关联的研究。排除了报告短期发病率(丢失后一年内)的研究、病例报告、信件和动物研究。研究选择和数据提取由 2 名独立评审员进行。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估偏倚风险,并使用漏斗图评估发表偏倚。亚组分析探讨了复发性流产对不良结局的影响。使用逆方差随机效应模型进行统计分析,并通过合并最调整的 RR、比值比(OR)和风险比(HR),根据罕见结局假设,以风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)和预测区间(PI)报告结果。我们纳入了 56 项观察性研究,其中 45 项进行了荟萃分析。共有 1,119,815 名经历过妊娠丢失的女性,其中 951,258 人流产,168,557 人死胎,而 11,965,574 名女性没有既往流产史。有死胎史的女性患缺血性心脏病(IHD)的风险更高(RR 1.56,95%CI [1.30,1.88];p<0.001,95%PI [0.49,5.15])、脑血管疾病(RR 1.71,95%CI [1.44,2.03];p<0.001,95%PI [1.92,2.42])和任何循环/心血管疾病(RR 1.86,95%CI [1.01,3.45];p=0.05,95%PI [0.74,4.10])的风险高于无妊娠丢失的女性。有流产史的女性患心血管疾病(IHD:RR 1.11,95%CI [0.98,1.27];95%PI [0.46,2.76])或脑血管疾病(RR 1.01,95%CI [0.85,1.21])的风险无增加。只有有死胎史的女性更有可能患 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)(RR:1.16,95%CI [1.07,2.26];p<0.001,95%PI [1.05,1.35])。有死胎史的女性患肾脏疾病的风险更高(RR 1.97,95%CI [1.51,2.57];p<0.001,95%PI [1.06,4.72])。有死胎史的女性患乳腺癌的风险较低(RR:0.80,95%CI [0.67,0.96];p-0.02,95%PI [0.72,0.93])。与对照组相比,有妊娠丢失史的女性患其他恶性肿瘤的风险没有增加。有妊娠丢失史的女性没有长期精神疾病风险(死胎:RR 1.90,95%CI [0.93,3.88];95%PI [0.34,9.51];流产:RR 1.78,95%CI [0.88,3.63];95%PI [1.13,4.16])。主要限制包括使用具有不同调整程度的汇总数据可能存在混杂。

结论

我们的结果表明,有死胎史的女性患心血管疾病、T2DM 和肾脏疾病的风险更高。经历流产,无论是单次还是多次,似乎没有改变的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeb6/10857720/09c14af4e43c/pmed.1004342.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验