Mellado-García Elena, Díaz-Rodríguez Lourdes, Cortés-Martín Jonathan, Sánchez-García Juan Carlos, Piqueras-Sola Beatriz, Higuero Macías Juan Carlos, Rodríguez-Blanque Raquel
Research Group CTS-1068, Andalusia Research Plan, Junta de Andalucía, 18014 Granada, Spain.
Costa del Sol Health District, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Junta de Andalucía, 29640 Fuengirola, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;12(3):373. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030373.
Although there is scientific evidence regarding the use of water immersion during labor, this evidence is primarily focused on the first stage of labor. There is limited scientific evidence on water immersion during the second stage of labor.
The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and synthesis of contemporary evidence related to water birth, with a specific focus on the second stage of labor.
A systematic review of the scientific literature published between January 2018 and October 2023 was carried out. A synthesis of the results was conducted following the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were utilized as information sources. The search strategy was designed using the keywords "immersion" and "parturition", along with their relevant synonyms. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies employing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and quantitative and qualitative approaches focusing on pregnant women undergoing water immersion at any stage of the labor process.
Eleven articles were selected: two systematic reviews (one quantitative and one qualitative), five cohort studies, one case-control study, one cross-sectional observational study, and two qualitative studies. A thorough assessment of the methodology was performed using several specific tools: the Cochrane RoB 2 (Risk of Bias 2) tool for systematic reviews, JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research for qualitative studies, STROBE for observational descriptive studies, and CASPe for qualitative studies. The results provided fundamental insights that will contribute to conceptual standardization regarding the effects of water birth on maternal and fetal health. Additionally, a synthesis of the results was performed concerning types of delivery, analgesia use, pain perception, and maternal satisfaction with the water birth experience.
In this study, we conclude that the results regarding delivery types, labor durations, and analgesia use found in the literature, along with statistically significant maternal/fetal effects, are crucial for making recommendations regarding the use of water during labor in any of its stages if the woman desires it safely.
尽管有关于分娩期间使用水浸浴的科学证据,但该证据主要集中在第一产程。关于第二产程水浸浴的科学证据有限。
本研究的目的是对与水中分娩相关的当代证据进行全面的系统评价和综合分析,特别关注第二产程。
对2018年1月至2023年10月发表的科学文献进行系统评价。按照非Meta分析的综合(SWiM)指南对结果进行综合分析。使用PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆作为信息来源。搜索策略使用关键词“浸浴”和“分娩”及其相关同义词进行设计。纳入标准包括采用随机对照试验(RCT)、系统评价以及侧重于分娩过程中任何阶段接受水浸浴的孕妇的定量和定性方法的研究。
共筛选出11篇文章:两篇系统评价(一篇定量和一篇定性)、五项队列研究、一项病例对照研究、一项横断面观察性研究和两项定性研究。使用几种特定工具对方法进行了全面评估:用于系统评价的Cochrane RoB 2(偏倚风险2)工具、用于定性研究的JBI定性研究批判性评价清单、用于观察性描述性研究的STROBE以及用于定性研究的CASPe。结果提供了基本见解,将有助于在水中分娩对母婴健康影响方面进行概念标准化。此外,还对分娩类型、镇痛使用、疼痛感知以及产妇对水中分娩体验的满意度进行了结果综合分析。
在本研究中,我们得出结论,文献中发现的关于分娩类型、产程持续时间和镇痛使用的结果,以及具有统计学意义的母婴效应,对于在女性安全希望的情况下就分娩任何阶段使用水的问题提出建议至关重要。