Community-Based Participatory Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Community-Based Participatory Research Center and University Research and Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Feb 13;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01111-z.
Community participation is currently utilized as a national strategy to promote public health and mitigate health inequalities across the world. While community participation is acknowledged as a civic right in the Constitution of Iran and other related upstream documents, the government has typically failed in translating, integrating and implementing community participation in health system policy. The present study was conducted to determine the level of public voice consideration within the health policy in Iran and address fundamental interventions required to promote the public voice in the context of Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI). This study has originality because there is no study that addresses the requirements of institutionalizing community participation especially in low-middle-income countries, so Iran's experience can be useful for other countries.
Methodologically, this study utilized a multi-method and multi-strand sequential research design, including qualitative, comparative and documentary studies. In the first phase, the current level of community participation in the health policy cycle of Iran was identified using the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) spectrum. In the second phase, a comparative study was designed to identify relevant interventions to promote the community participation level in the selected countries under study. In the third phase, a qualitative study was conducted to address the barriers, facilitators and strategies for improving the level of public participation. Accordingly, appropriate interventions and policy options were recommended. Interventions were reviewed in a policy dialogue with policy-makers and community representatives, and their effectiveness, applicability and practical feasibility were evaluated.
Based on the IAP2 spectrum, the level of community participation in the health policy-making process is non-participation, while empowerment is set at the highest level in the upstream documents. Moreover, capacity-building, demand, mobilization of the local population, provision of resources and setting a specific structure were found to be among the key interventions to improve the level of community participation in Iran's health sector. More importantly, "political will for action" was identified as the driving force for implementing the necessary health interventions.
To sum up, a paradigm shift in the governing social, economic and political philosophy; establishing a real-world and moral dialogue and communication between the government and the society; identifying and managing the conflicts of interest in the leading stockholders of the healthcare system; and, more importantly, maintaining a stable political will for action are integral to promote and institutionalize participatory governance in the health sector of Iran. All of the above will lead us to scheme, implement and institutionalize suitable interventions for participatory governance in health and medicine.
社区参与目前被用作一项全球战略,以促进公共卫生并减轻世界各地的健康不平等。虽然社区参与在伊朗宪法和其他相关上游文件中被承认为公民权利,但政府通常未能将其转化、整合并落实到卫生系统政策中。本研究旨在确定伊朗卫生政策中公众意见的考虑程度,并提出在伊朗伊斯兰共和国(IRI)背景下促进公众意见所需的基本干预措施。本研究具有创新性,因为没有研究涉及到特别是在中低收入国家将社区参与制度化的要求,因此伊朗的经验对其他国家可能有用。
在方法上,本研究采用了多方法和多链序贯研究设计,包括定性、比较和文献研究。在第一阶段,利用国际公众参与协会(IAP2)频谱确定伊朗卫生政策周期中社区参与的现状。在第二阶段,设计了一项比较研究,以确定在所选研究国家促进社区参与水平的相关干预措施。在第三阶段,进行了一项定性研究,以解决提高公众参与水平的障碍、促进因素和策略。因此,提出了适当的干预措施和政策选择。在与政策制定者和社区代表的政策对话中审查了干预措施,并评估了其有效性、适用性和实际可行性。
根据 IAP2 频谱,社区参与卫生决策过程的水平是非参与,而在上游文件中授权处于最高水平。此外,发现能力建设、需求、动员当地人口、提供资源和建立特定结构等是提高伊朗卫生部门社区参与水平的关键干预措施之一。更重要的是,“行动的政治意愿”被确定为实施必要卫生干预措施的驱动力。
总之,在社会、经济和政治哲学的治理方面进行范式转变;在政府和社会之间建立真实和道德的对话和沟通;确定和管理医疗保健系统主要股东的利益冲突;更重要的是,保持稳定的行动政治意愿,这些都是促进和将参与式治理制度化纳入伊朗卫生部门的组成部分。所有这些都将导致我们制定、实施和制度化适合参与式治理的卫生和医学干预措施。