Suppr超能文献

外周动脉疾病随机临床试验中的多样性:系统评价。

Diversity in randomized clinical trials for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review.

机构信息

Duke Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27707, USA.

Health Economics & Market Access, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, 01752, USA.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 13;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02104-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Significant race and sex disparities exist in the prevalence, diagnosis, and outcomes of peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, clinical trials evaluating treatments for PAD often lack representative patient populations. This systematic review aims to summarize the demographic representation and enrollment strategies in clinical trials of lower-extremity endovascular interventions for PAD.

METHODS

Following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched multiple sources (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov, WHO clinical trial registry) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RCT protocols, and peer-reviewed journal publications of RCTs conducted between January 2012 and December 2022. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize trial characteristics, publication or study protocol characteristics, and the reporting of demographic characteristics. Meta-regression was used to explore associations between demographic characteristics and certain trial characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 2,374 records were identified. Of these, 59 met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 35 trials, 14 publications, and 10 protocols. Information regarding demographic representation was frequently missing. While all 14 trial publications reported age and sex, only 4 reported race/ethnicity, and none reported socioeconomic or marital status. Additionally, only 4 publications reported clinical outcomes by demographic characteristics. Meta-regression analysis revealed that 6% more women were enrolled in non-European trials (36%) than in European trials (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this review highlight potential issues that may compromise the reliability and external validity of study findings in lower-extremity PAD RCTs when applied to the real-world population. Addressing these issues is crucial to enhance the generalizability and impact of clinical trial results in the field of PAD, ultimately leading to improved clinical outcomes for patients in underrepresented populations.

REGISTRATION

The systematic review methodology was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022378304).

摘要

背景

外周动脉疾病(PAD)在患病率、诊断和结局方面存在显著的种族和性别差异。然而,评估 PAD 治疗方法的临床试验通常缺乏代表性的患者人群。本系统评价旨在总结下肢血管内介入治疗 PAD 的临床试验中的人口统计学代表性和纳入策略。

方法

根据 2020 年系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,我们在多个来源(Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane、Clinicaltrials.gov、世界卫生组织临床试验注册平台)中搜索了 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间进行的随机对照试验(RCT)、RCT 方案和同行评议的 RCT 期刊出版物。描述性分析用于总结试验特征、发表或研究方案特征以及人口统计学特征的报告。Meta 回归用于探索人口统计学特征与某些试验特征之间的关联。

结果

共确定了 2374 条记录。其中,59 项符合纳入标准,包括 35 项试验、14 项出版物和 10 项方案。人口统计学代表性的信息经常缺失。虽然 14 项试验出版物均报告了年龄和性别,但仅有 4 项报告了种族/民族,且均未报告社会经济或婚姻状况。此外,仅有 4 项出版物报告了按人口统计学特征的临床结局。Meta 回归分析显示,非欧洲试验(36%)比欧洲试验(30%)纳入了 6%的女性。

结论

本综述的结果强调了在将下肢 PAD RCT 研究结果应用于真实人群时,可能会影响研究发现的可靠性和外部有效性的潜在问题。解决这些问题对于提高 PAD 领域临床试验结果的普遍性和影响力至关重要,最终为代表性不足的人群中的患者带来更好的临床结局。

登记

系统评价方法学已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记处(PROSPERO:CRD42022378304)上公布。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c9b/10865563/7fd8ee530ac8/12939_2024_2104_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验